that fluke play could have easily been a pick six tho. I actually anticipated that while the ball was fluttering thru the air.I hate fluke plays. Absolutely hate them. In fact, if I knew football could be played in a vacuum where only legitimate plays counted and the team that gained the most first downs and yards always won, I would be almost too pleased.
If it counts for anything, I would be incredibly empty almost to the same extent if Bama was on the winning side of some dumb luck play where a ball boomeranged of some opposing players cleat lace.
In regurgitating the game Sunday with friends, I posed the question: What if any play where the ball last struck an offensive or defensive player in an area other than his hands or arms would be immediately blown dead and ruled an incomplete pass? Or, if the ball leaves the periphery of the first person who comes in contact and could make a play on the ball in general, offense or defense. At first, it was chuckled off but soon in to my points most thought it to be a good idea.
I'm not talking about "trick" plays that are well executed and without penalty; I'm talking about a team getting rewarded for making a really bad decision(s) such as making a hasty throw after a bad center exchange and throwing across one's body without bothering to make a read on the defense. No one should be rewarded for that.
Do you have an argument for or against that? Am I oversimplifying it? Is there some canon of football this would destroy?
So, as children in a Victorian household, they should be seen but not heard?I don't think they should be aloud.
What about allowed, do you think they should be allowed?I don't think they should be aloud.
Hahaha, now that's funny...because it's true.Of course not. Imagine how long every game with Auburn would take.
Maybe he thinks they should always be a silent count?What about allowed, do you think they should be allowed?