Yes, they had 30 rushes for 205 yards, which is a 6.8 yard per carry average. Take away the 83 yard rush late in the game when it was already 38-3, you get 29 rushes for 122 yards, which averages out to be 4.2 yards per rush.I'd say the range of scoring possibilities for Alabama is 21-35 with Arkansas in the range of 0-17.
Hogs have held all opponents well below their season averages in points. First question is how much damage Brandon Allen can do through the air. Last year in a less effective scheme, Allen was 21-40 for 246 yards against the Tide.
Second question is whether the Razorbacks can run the football at all. Chubb-Michel-Marshall were 30-205. Not exactly shut down. The Bulldogs' ineptitude at quarterback doomed them.
Alabama is just like Arkansas in that -- if the QB matchup is favorable, the Tide's home free. If not ... see the case of Chad Kelly v. University of Alabama. Main difference here is that the Hogs lack any receivers as good as Treadwell, Core and Adeboyejo. Without players who can get open in the red zone, the Hogs march up there and fall flat.
No. I'd be ecstatic if the Hogs could break 4 yards per carry against this defense.Yes, they had 30 rushes for 205 yards, which is a 6.8 yard per carry average. Take away the 83 yard rush late in the game when it was already 38-3, you get 29 rushes for 122 yards, which averages out to be 4.2 yards per rush.
Consider that shut down?
This is a key point. Look at Arkansas' offensive yardage. They move the ball well between the 30s. But they just can't score when they get in close. I'm not sure what they need to do to correct that, but Alabama's defense isn't the kind of defense that you want to go experimenting against.Without players who can get open in the red zone, the Hogs march up there and fall flat.
Did you NOT see the Saban press conference yesterday? There will be NO hangover.....I'd almost guarantee it24-17 good guys. Maybe a bit of a hangover from last weeks win.