The process of refugee entry into the US explained

Displaced Bama Fan · Nov 20, 2015

Tidewater said:
I'll say that. If muslim immigrants voted Republican by an 80%-20% margin, there would be no discussion of admitting Syrian refugees at all, much less increasing the number admitted.

You've got to be kidding, right?

CrimsonNagus · Nov 20, 2015

Bamaro said:
Ask yourself how they can vote without citizenship first.

Ask yourself how dead people continue to vote.

Tidewater · Nov 20, 2015

Displaced Bama Fan said:
You've got to be kidding, right?

No, I'm dead serious. If polling showed that muslim immigrants, once they got to vote, would vote 80%-20% Republican, Obama and Hillary would not have even brought the subject up. He would be be declaring the need to "keep America safe," etc. etc.

Tidewater · Nov 20, 2015

This is rich.
US May Have Let 'Dozens' of Terrorists Into Country As Refugees
so
the Obama Administration Stopped Processing Iraq Refugee Requests For 6 Months In 2011.

The One said:
That's not American. That's not who we are.

How can any sentient being can still continue to apologize for and support this schmuck at this point?

ValuJet · Nov 20, 2015

We are so very fortunate to have President Obama to constantly remind of us of who we are. Normally when making a case for adding another $1 trllion or so to the debt.

RammerJammer14 · Nov 20, 2015

All I'm saying is. I'm not a fan of forcing a significant demographic shift on people in these communities that the president wants to dump these refugees.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ValuJet · Nov 20, 2015

Take a look at those three year old orphans fleeing Syria. Aren't they precious? Don't you just want to squeeze and cuddle them?

Bamaro · Nov 20, 2015

Tidewater said:
I'll say that. If muslim immigrants voted Republican by an 80%-20% margin, there would be no discussion of admitting Syrian refugees at all, much less increasing the number admitted.

You really dont understand the democratic mindset. It has very little to do with future voters and everything to do with them thinking that they are doing the right thing (without considering the consequences).

Tidewater · Nov 20, 2015

Bamaro said:
You really dont understand the democratic mindset. It has very little to do with future voters and everything to do with them thinking that they are doing the right thing (without considering the consequences).

You may be right. Maybe I am being cynical.
I just think it has everything to do with voting blocks.

Robt. MacMillan said:
During one trip, Johnson was discussing his proposed civil rights bill with two governors. Explaining why it was so important to him, he said it was simple: “I’ll have them (African-Americans) voting Democratic for two hundred years.” “That was the reason he was pushing the bill,” said MacMillan, who was present during the conversation. “Not because he wanted equality for everyone. It was strictly a political ploy for the Democratic party. He was phony from the word, 'go.'"

Ronald Kessler, Inside the White House, (NY: Simon & Schuster, 1995), p. 33.
LBJ's first impulse was political. He then resorted to cant to back up the position his political impulses directed him to assume.
I think BHO is as sincere as LBJ.

Bodhisattva · Nov 20, 2015

Bamaro said:
You really dont understand the democratic mindset. It has very little to do with future voters and everything to do with them thinking with their emotions (without caring who pays the bill or consequences).

FIFY

64met · Nov 20, 2015

So, let's say we let them in. What then? Do they have jobs, income? What about healthcare, who will pay for it?

Oh wait, that's right... I am supposed to pay.

dvldog · Nov 20, 2015

Let's dislodge ISIS and move refugees into the space. Arm them and say defend yourself.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Elefantman · Nov 20, 2015

64met said:
So, let's say we let them in. What then? Do they have jobs, income? What about healthcare, who will pay for it?

Oh wait, that's right... I am supposed to pay.

Here is one way to off set some of the cost.

Gr8hope · Nov 20, 2015

"That's not who we are."
This keeps being tossed out there when anyone suggest that we cannot take in thousands of refugees, when some of them want to kill us.
I suggest it is exactly who we are except when it is expedient politically to claim our Christianity or goodness.
This country glorifies perversions, legalized homosexual marriage, and allows the murder of the most helpless and innocent of human life through abortion. Lying and corruption is solidly entrenched and accepted from our leaders and government. It is hypocrisy to demand this be done because "we are better than that."
No, we are not better than that and until we get our own house in order in regards to what is right and wrong we have no moral high ground to proclaim.
May God forgive us for what we have become.

Gr8hope · Nov 20, 2015

REFUGEE HYPOCRISY? Christians deported amid DC debate on Syrians

TideWatcher · Nov 20, 2015

Ha Ha Ha; you were trying to elicit a laugh?

Bamaro said:
You really dont understand the democratic mindset. It has very little to do with future voters and everything to do with them thinking that they are doing the right thing (without considering the consequences).

MOAN · Nov 21, 2015

Which bothers you more, having 10,000 or whatever legally, (whether you like the process or not they are legal), brought in refugees, or estimates that I have seen as high as 40 million illegal aliens living in the country now? Personally the 10,000 Syrian refugees are a far less concern for me. We already got more terrorist than you can shake a limber noodle at now living amongst us!!

Bama Reb · Nov 21, 2015

Bamaro said:
Ask yourself how they can vote without citizenship first.

There are already Mexicans being allowed to vote without the benefit of citizenship. What's the difference?

Bamaro · Nov 21, 2015

Bama Reb said:
There are already Mexicans being allowed to vote without the benefit of citizenship. What's the difference?

Any documentation on this?

Jon · Nov 21, 2015

Bama Reb said:
There are already Mexicans being allowed to vote without the benefit of citizenship. What's the difference?

and States, like Alabama, are making it extremely hard to impossible for citizens to vote so let's not act like only the left is trying to play with the numbers here. For the record the behavior on both sides is despicable

http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/09/alabama_sends_message_we_are_t.html

The process of refugee entry into the US explained

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Moderator

Hall of Fame

Moderator

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

All-American

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

All-American

All-American

All-SEC

All-American

Suspended

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!