At the time, there was a lot of outrage being leveled at Osborne, but little of it was picked up at the national level. Too many people were caught up in the fact that Osborne was on the verge fo finally winning a championship.
Osborne reminds me of Jim Tressell--a teflon coach who maintains his image despite the piles of evience against him.
JThomas is correct (from my memory).
Btw - there was something else that was stirring the pot at the exact same time. In this case, you had Phillips (black) and McEwen (white). At the EXACT SAME TIME, you had OJ Simpson on trial for murder of his white ex-wife and her white friend - and his history of domestic violence against her. It was one of those situations where the attention to the issue was even higher than normal because of the parallels. Danged if Osborne didn't bring him back three weeks after OJ's acquittal.
There was a LOT of outrage at the time of October 1995. But the World Wide Web (to say nothing of universal usage of it) was in its infancy stage and - as JT correctly notes - Nebraska won and Phillips had a great game. That's the thing because that's how it always is.
Ray Lewis has uh......SOME level of involvement (real or perceived) and gets torn to shreds........his team wins the Super Bowl with his superhuman performance and it becomes a great story of his overcoming adversity (although Disney wouldn't touch Lewis with a ten-foot pole for the obligatory 'I'm going to Disney World' spiel)
Kobe Bryant uh.......well SOMETHING happened......but he wins an NBA title for the third straight year and it becomes 'Kobe continually battled adversity' (set aside the inconvenient truth it was self-inflicted adversity)
Peter Warrick steals from Dillard's but that bastion of morality and virtue Bobby Bowden brings him back just in time to have a great Sugar Bowl and beat Va Tech for the national title. The story becomes Warrick was 'robbed' of the Heisman.
Mike Tyson's biggest faux pas wasn't whatever happened with Desiree Washington in the Indiana motel room.......it's the fact that he was better known for losing to Buster Douglas than being the champ. If he had been the champ and been acquitted then the narrative would have been about him overcoming adversity (especially if his November 1991 fight with Holyfield had taken place and he had won - the fight was cancelled in October due to an injury suffered by Tyson)
One erroneous thing JT - Osborne had ALREADY won the 1994 national championship so the excitement was less than it would have been BUT - you're correct that there was a whole 'can he after all these years suddenly have a great dynasty?'
Furthermore - as I showed - it wasn't JUST Phillips. Had it been only Phillips then Osborne's apologists would have a point.