But, but, but, I thought she was broke?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-organizations-paid-hillary-clinton-2013-2015
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-organizations-paid-hillary-clinton-2013-2015
They all overpaid. I wouldn't pay 21 cents to hear her speak.But, but, but, I thought she was broke?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-organizations-paid-hillary-clinton-2013-2015
Sounds like she's the appointed, errr, the anointed one.It's sort of hard to believe she would be that much in demand. She doesn't exactly inspire.
Could it be that an agent or speaker's bureau was out pimping her as the next president? $250K is probably a bargain for an outfit like The National Association of Realtors to ensure access to policy briefings and White House entertainment events.
...and if she loses...all that money down the toilet.Sounds like she's the appointed, errr, the anointed one.
We can print another billion dollars...it's nothing, really. Just paper and ink....and if she loses...all that money down the toilet.
the only way this election would be any worse would be if Shrillary were running against Jeb!
Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.She was raking in over 1 million a week and they are still broke?? Unbelievable, why would she lie about something like that???
She loses this time, she'll be as we say around here "washed up." This is her last rodeo. There will be no more money for her if she can't deliver something in return.Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.
Just wait till one of these clowns loses. We'll have to open an Irk Board just to contain the mass irkage.I'm always amused by liberals who favor higher taxes so we can 'help the poor.'
Why isn't Hillary 'helping the poor' right now by giving away a little here and a little there directly to them?
Republicans irk me because they say they're 'against government' and then run to hold a job......in government.
Democrats irk me because they say they care more about the poor yet you never see hardly any of them (yes, there have been exceptions - Jerry Brown was one) at a soup kitchen or giving away their OWN money; instead, it entails running for a position of power to FORCE OTHERS to help the so-called less fortunate*
Needless to say, I spend a lot of time irked.
* - except military veterans, of course
Better off if she loses? When the money starts coming in from the lobbyist they will be very rich only if she wins. If she loses then she will have to work.Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.
To say nothing of the money she's already been paid. She'll learn all too soon that nothing is free.She loses this time, she'll be as we say around here "washed up." This is her last rodeo. There will be no more money for her if she can't deliver something in return.
Work? LOL!Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.
Thats not how it worksBetter off if she loses? When the money starts coming in from the lobbyist they will be very rich only if she wins. If she loses then she will have to work.