Hillary's speaking engagements fetch $21MM

Displaced Bama Fan said:

But, but, but, I thought she was broke?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-organizations-paid-hillary-clinton-2013-2015

Click to expand...

They all overpaid. I wouldn't pay 21 cents to hear her speak.

She was raking in over 1 million a week and they are still broke?? Unbelievable, why would she lie about something like that???

Have you heard the expression ''The best politicians money can buy''? Well, there ya go.
Virtually every one of those 20 minute''speeches'' (for which she was paid anywhere between $125K-$400K each) were to a banking/lending institution. If she gains the White house, we will have more than the first female President. We'll have the first female President who is literally bought and paid for.

It's sort of hard to believe she would be that much in demand. She doesn't exactly inspire.

Could it be that an agent or speaker's bureau was out pimping her as the next president? $250K is probably a bargain for an outfit like The National Association of Realtors to ensure access to policy briefings and White House entertainment events.

Displaced Bama Fan said:

Sounds like she's the appointed, errr, the anointed one.

Click to expand...

...and if she loses...all that money down the toilet.

the only way this election would be any worse would be if Shrillary were running against Jeb!

I'm always amused by liberals who favor higher taxes so we can 'help the poor.'

Why isn't Hillary 'helping the poor' right now by giving away a little here and a little there directly to them?

Republicans irk me because they say they're 'against government' and then run to hold a job......in government.
Democrats irk me because they say they care more about the poor yet you never see hardly any of them (yes, there have been exceptions - Jerry Brown was one) at a soup kitchen or giving away their OWN money; instead, it entails running for a position of power to FORCE OTHERS to help the so-called less fortunate*


Needless to say, I spend a lot of time irked.






* - except military veterans, of course

Elefantman said:

She was raking in over 1 million a week and they are still broke?? Unbelievable, why would she lie about something like that???

Click to expand...

Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.

Bamaro said:

Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.

Click to expand...

She loses this time, she'll be as we say around here "washed up." This is her last rodeo. There will be no more money for her if she can't deliver something in return.

selmaborntidefan said:

I'm always amused by liberals who favor higher taxes so we can 'help the poor.'

Why isn't Hillary 'helping the poor' right now by giving away a little here and a little there directly to them?

Republicans irk me because they say they're 'against government' and then run to hold a job......in government.
Democrats irk me because they say they care more about the poor yet you never see hardly any of them (yes, there have been exceptions - Jerry Brown was one) at a soup kitchen or giving away their OWN money; instead, it entails running for a position of power to FORCE OTHERS to help the so-called less fortunate*


Needless to say, I spend a lot of time irked.






* - except military veterans, of course

Click to expand...

Just wait till one of these clowns loses. We'll have to open an Irk Board just to contain the mass irkage.

Bamaro said:

Some of you need to be paying closer attention. They claimed they were broke 15 years ago. Since then they have been raking in the speaking fees (good work if you can get it). They will actually be much richer if she loses and she can go back to speaking fees.

Click to expand...

Better off if she loses? When the money starts coming in from the lobbyist they will be very rich only if she wins. If she loses then she will have to work.

ValuJet said:

She loses this time, she'll be as we say around here "washed up." This is her last rodeo. There will be no more money for her if she can't deliver something in return.

Click to expand...

To say nothing of the money she's already been paid. She'll learn all too soon that nothing is free.

crimson fan man said:

Better off if she loses? When the money starts coming in from the lobbyist they will be very rich only if she wins. If she loses then she will have to work.

Click to expand...

Thats not how it works

Bamaro said:

Thats not how it works

Click to expand...

Nor Hillary.