http://georgia.247sports.com/Bolt/SECs-in-game-rule-changes-for-2016-45613161
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't these sites have editors? (Being married to the yearbook adviser has made me even more aware of these petty errors.)Once the ball has left the tackle box, a player cannot block another below the waste on a player moving from the inside to the perimeter.
Be careful what you wish for. If the replay officials can review anything they think is a no call, the college game could be ruined.Interesting that the replay booth can stop play to review a possible no-call on targeting, and if warranted, call the penalty from the box. Essentially overturn a no-call.
But that power extends only to targeting. As in, if there's a lineman 8 yards downfield on a pass play, and the officials on the field miss it, the replay booth can't overturn the miss. Sure wish they could review that one.
Interesting that the replay booth can stop play to review a possible no-call on targeting, and if warranted, call the penalty from the box. Essentially overturn a no-call.
But that power extends only to targeting. As in, if there's a lineman 8 yards downfield on a pass play, and the officials on the field miss it, the replay booth can't overturn the miss. Sure wish they could review that one.
I agree with Basket Case. Maybe allow it on illegal plays that score touchdowns.Be careful what you wish for. If the replay officials can review anything they think is a no call, the college game could be ruined.
Great idea. Since they review all scoring plays anyway, simply add this to that review. IMO, this and "rub" route are the most important calls to get right in the game. Teams have added these plays on purpose, knowing that the officials miss most of them. But, if a TD is scored on a pass play, this aspect should be subject to review.I agree with Basket Case. Maybe allow it on illegal plays that score touchdowns.
The article was probably written (or edited) by a barner....:cool2:Why is the picture of Saban right above the new rule on unsportsmanlike conduct? Shouldn't that have been Muschamp?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A Barner writing and/or editing? Seriously?The article was probably written (or edited) by a barner....:cool2:
I sea you're point, but know one pays attention to stuff like that anymore. If it gets through spell check, that's all that matters.Don't these sites have editors? (Being married to the yearbook adviser has made me even more aware of these petty errors.)
A Barner writing and/or editing? Seriously?
hahahahahahai sea you're point, but know one pays attention to stuff like that anymore. If it gets through spell check, that's all that matters.
Isn't it just the NFL that does that?Great idea. Since they review all scoring plays anyway, simply add this to that review. IMO, this and "rub" route are the most important calls to get right in the game. Teams have added these plays on purpose, knowing that the officials miss most of them. But, if a TD is scored on a pass play, this aspect should be subject to review.
Eye sea what you did they're.I sea you're point, but know one pays attention to stuff like that anymore. If it gets through spell check, that's all that matters.
The B1G does, too. They also did this in the playoff. Not sure if they are doing this across the entire NCAA.Isn't it just the NFL that does that?
Sure would've changed the dynamics of Aub 13 game and OM 15.Great idea. Since they review all scoring plays anyway, simply add this to that review. IMO, this and "rub" route are the most important calls to get right in the game. Teams have added these plays on purpose, knowing that the officials miss most of them. But, if a TD is scored on a pass play, this aspect should be subject to review.