Anything in particular you care to discuss?
Nuts was too strong of a word. I was basing that on some of what I had seen and read of the delegates' discussion of the platform. The platform in writing is actually quite sensible. I like a lot of it - the overwhelming majority of it actually.
I think selling insurance across state lines is a mistake, barring a complete restructuring of how insurance is governed among states and feds.
I also think repealing ALL laws related to all drugs, medicinal and recreational, would be a grievous error. I get decriminalization of marijuana and am all for it - but decriminalizing heroin, cocaine, MDMA, etc. would be bad news IMHO. Also, the FDA came to regulate medicines for a reason, and the makers of these medicines must have certain protections for their products or Americans would never see a new drug hit the market and probably lose access to a lot of safe and effective medicines.
I don't quite understand what they are trying to say in the point on the environment, but I'm not sure I agree with the basic tenet of further reducing government's role in environmental protection even from a libertarian perspective. Same goes for their point on illegal legal tender.
Finally, if CA has taught the country anything, it's that enabling more initiatives and referendums is not always a good thing and often just lead to more initiatives and referendums to fix what was done before via initiatives and referendums. I think they should be very very rare.
