That's what I think too.IMO, this seems to be somewhat of the situation - tie goes to the "veteran".
Totally agree. Unless Bateman/Barnett just completely turn the corner this year, I can't realistically see a scenario where Hurts doesn't play.I think Bateman will start the game based on everything I know at this point. However, I'd say there's a very high probability that there is a 1B named as well and that he gets some playing time.
Wow. Don't ever see this happening. I think it is certain 2 will play but playing 3 against a team like USC would mean the 2 that played first did not do good.At this point I'd say all three play, in this order:
Bateman
Barnett
Hurts
Or that the first 1 did REALLY well.Wow. Don't ever see this happening. I think it is certain 2 will play but playing 3 against a team like USC would mean the 2 that played first did not do good.