http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...rojans-lead-list-college-football-blue-bloods
We are 1 of 8 according to them. :BigA:
We are 1 of 8 according to them. :BigA:
They seem to place way too much emphasis on winning the Heisman. I just prefer NCs, conference championships and overall wins! A Heisman is just "gravy."Tied for first!
Kinda scratch my head with that but I totally agree.
Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
In all the years we had played and never had a Heisman winner. It really never bother me one bit. Now we have two well it really does not add to what Alabama Football is. I agree, N.C. and SEC championships are more important. Looking back at some of the teams of the 70's, we could have had more that one Heisman winner, but CPB was all about the team winning. At least we were above ND in the article.They seem to place way too much emphasis on winning the Heisman. I just prefer NCs, conference championships and overall wins! A Heisman is just "gravy."
Teams are listed in alphabetical order within each score. Bama and its 4 peers are tied with a score of 10.Tied for first!
Kinda scratch my head with that but I totally agree.
Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
By their count we have 11 to Notre Dames 8, Sooners 7 & Buckeyes 6I can understand their reasoning for having us tied, but, the ultimate goal of a College Football Program is to win the NC Trophy & no team comes close to Alabama in the history of the game of doing that..
Yeah, I guess it's not an order but just a rating.Teams are listed in alphabetical order within each score. Bama and its 4 peers are tied with a score of 10.
Yeah, it's a team sport. This isn't golf or tennis (singles).They seem to place way too much emphasis on winning the Heisman. I just prefer NCs, conference championships and overall wins! A Heisman is just "gravy."
Exactly & is why I would lean towards Bama being #1 all to ourselves..By their count we have 11 to Notre Dames 8, Sooners 7 & Buckeyes 6
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk