I'm not old, but this thread makes me feel old.
Just makes me realize how much a young Bama fan missed out on.
Some for the better.
Talked to my Oregon-based buddy today (Washington Huskies fan) and he said that the young Tide fans of today - say, those in their early 20s (born 1992-1997) REALLY have no earthly idea that what is going on now is NOT NORMAL in any sense of the term. How many GENUINE 7-year dynasties can you name during the television era?
Alabama 1960-1966 (and those were NOT title years at the beginning and end; three titles)
Oklahoma 1971-1980 (two titles)
Florida State 1987-2002 (two titles)
Miami 1983-1994 (four titles)
Nebraska 1993-2001 (three titles)
USC 2002-2008 (two titles)
Alabama 2008-???? (four titles)
I basically allowed a team one 'out of the norm' season but expected the other years to have ONE LOSS at most (two if the bowl game was the second). Some teams like Penn State in the late 70s and early 80s had two mini-dynasties, periods of very good records of 2-3 years with a 2-3 year gap in between; USC would win it all and then drop to a four-loss team and then climb back to the top about four years later (1962-67-72-74-78).
There is NOTHING normal about this in the actual competitive era of college football, and it will be a long time before we have another one. Yes, USC had a seven-year run where they were quite dominant, but go look at it a little closer (and I'm setting aside the old 'they got stripped for cheating' argument) - they lost to HUGE underdogs (2006 UCLA, 2007 Stanford) and weren't dominant season across season (they trailed several times by huge margins in 2005 in the third quarter). And even then, they got one title and shared a second one they technically didn't earn.
Young folks, this is NOT normal by any means. Enjoy it every day.