and they will probably get the same end result, a stomach ache and a hand full of junkThe difference is you can walk in and "gauge" their interest for 20 bucks. Awbarn will need to walk in with 20 million bucks.
and they will probably get the same end result, a stomach ache and a hand full of junkThe difference is you can walk in and "gauge" their interest for 20 bucks. Awbarn will need to walk in with 20 million bucks.
They weren't on a plane. They never officially spoke to anyone. They never unofficially spoke to anyone. This was all backdoor stuff that goes on anytime a big name program is about to toss their coach. It's literally no big deal at all.They might as well been on a plane last year. After losing to Bama and Arky the rumors started to come up. Booger, Brando, and spears were all saying there was some real truth to that at the time. It wasn't into the next week in Oxford that everything was known. I'll remind you walking into Tuscaloosa LSU was 7-0 with the heisman front runner, and the next week your back office is rumored to being inquiring about jimbo fisher through jimmy sexton?
So no this wasn't a pull the trigger firing it was a long drawn out thing. Richt was a pull the trigger firing and les was a tommy tuberville type firing. The simple fact that all these back door discussions were so public and the the governor got involved shows a complete mess in the back office. Same as auburn without them actually landing in Tallahassee, but again they might has well.
They could always throw in a "we're sorry about last year" signing bonus into the deal.From what I heard last year when the 'fire Les' thing fell apart, Jimbo was pretty ticked about it as he agreed to a deal then LSU backed out...
Jumbo might say that he had no contact with LSU. If you really believe that jumbo, sexton, or some other well positioned middle man didn't have contact with LSU then I have some time shares that I would be willing to sell you. Point is the president, governor, state legislature, and a portion of the fans told those back office folks to shut up and color. There was contact in some form or fashionThey weren't on a plane. They never officially spoke to anyone. They never unofficially spoke to anyone. This was all backdoor stuff that goes on anytime a big name program is about to toss their coach. It's literally no big deal at all.
We don't know this. The only reason we know about Auburn and Petrino was due to a journalist getting wind of it. That's it.They weren't on a plane. They never officially spoke to anyone. They never unofficially spoke to anyone. This was all backdoor stuff that goes on anytime a big name program is about to toss their coach. It's literally no big deal at all.
LSU's decision to part ways with head football coach Les Miles and offensive coordinator Cam Cameron wasn't a package deal after all, a source with knowledge of the situation said Monday.
After replacing Miles on an interim basis Sunday, Ed Orgeron was given the option to make the call on LSU's embattled offensive coordinator, the source said.
Orgeron ultimately decided a major change in philosophy was needed and chose to elevate tight ends coach Steve Ensminger to the position. Ensminger, a former LSU quarterback, has been a coordinator at multiple stops in his 30-year career, including McNeese State, Louisiana Tech, Texas A&M and Clemson. He had been coaching tight ends at LSU since 2010.
Also just about every LSU fan everywhere, IMO. That also played a role in his dismissal as well. Never seen anything quite like it.I must be doing a terrible job explaining my point of view because you guys are pretty smart and you think that I am saying something that I am not trying to say.
I am saying that Miles cannot beat Saban because Alabama is in the heads of his players and his coaching staff. Alabama expects to find a way to win those games, while LSU now expects to find a way to lose them. Most of the games have been very close, but the last 5 all went Alabama's way. What does that do to the psyche of a team?
For a while, because Miles won some of these match-ups, the players went into the season really believing that they could and should beat Alabama. The loss in 2014 ended that, IMO. And the way that you guys beat them last year was particularly crushing - you just ran the ball down their throats and beat them, strength on strength.
In college football, where championships are the goal, what happens in the mind of players who believe that their success in other games is meaningless because Alabama is just going to roll into town and take it all away in November? That has happened twice in the last 4 seasons. Alabama is living rent free in the minds of the players and coaches at LSU. That is the problem.
Can Miles beat Saban? He has in the past. More recently, Miles puts teams on the field physically capable of beating Alabama, but mentally incapable. Miles has them physically prepared. They match up well with you guys. But they just can't close the deal. Sure, the CEO has to take the fall for that, but not because he forgot how to do his job or because he just can't or won't keep up with the times.
The administration's only role in this is in deciding to meddle in Miles' program before they fired him, and doing so in a public way. Fire him or let him coach - his way. He isn't Mike Shula. He has earned that right.
But, if LSU wins those two close games (2012 ans 2014), or even one of those games (2014), Miles still has his job because his players would not have given up on him or his system. They wouldn't have 10 losses in their last 29 games. They would probably be undefeated right now, in this season.
I will start with this, I was given a timeout for my repeated assertions that Shula would never cut it. The difference was, he wasn't ever even close to being a national championship coach. Not just that, but we can take it a step further and look at Chizik, who had 0 track record of sustained success. When we talk about Fulmer, Miles, Brown, Bowden and Bryant, we talk about 5 coaches who won titles, 5 coaches who had sustained success, and 5 coaches who all had prolonged periods in which they struggled. Two of those coaches were given chance to right the ship, and the two examples we have of teams that fired one of their best coaches ever, struggled just to have winning seasons afterwards! So that's the risk/reward, you fire a great coach and may be you miss out on what is yet to come, and at the same time you risk having losing seasons. It's worked out great for Texas and Tennessee this year though right? May be this is the year they don't suck!There's nothing wrong with that. Keep mixing it up until you find someone who can beat him.
We have our own history with beleaguered coaches whose teams performed very well at times, but had a monkey on their back with respect to a cross-state rival. I don't think it necessarily affected the players with a mindset of futility, but it sure affected the fan and booster support.In college football, where championships are the goal, what happens in the mind of players who believe that their success in other games is meaningless because Alabama is just going to roll into town and take it all away in November? That has happened twice in the last 4 seasons. Alabama is living rent free in the minds of the players and coaches at LSU. That is the problem.
Saban is currently the longest tenured head football coach in the SEC, so maybe the answer is yes, at least for those programs who expect to be competitive at the top.Here's the bottom line though. You get fired if you can't beat Saban.
So, is every coach in the SEC on borrowed time as long as he's around? The only coaches who are going to be given job security are the coaches with fanbases rational enough to understand you can't count on consistently beating Nick Saban.
Well... I haven't posted in forever, but... there's only one Saban. Maybe someday there will be a better college football coach -- and maybe my grand kids will live to see it. But, until then Saban is the best there is (and IMO ever has been) and he is at Alabama until he decides to retire... and the rest of us just have to deal with it. He rarely gets beaten and the way he has the program running now I think you're on top until he decides it's time to step down. So... the rest of us have to hope to get better every year and slip up and win an SEC championship and get to the playoffs. Otherwise, it's Alabama 1st and everyone else is somewhere way behind them.Here's the bottom line though. You get fired if you can't beat Saban.
So, is every coach in the SEC on borrowed time as long as he's around? The only coaches who are going to be given job security are the coaches with fanbases rational enough to understand you can't count on consistently beating Nick Saban.
The high powered boosters that wanted Miles gone last year finally got their way. They did not want another scenerio playing out where he wins some big games and rebuilds fan support so they have to look like goats for firing him at the end of the season. Now was the perfect time to let him go.I'm not a big fan of the LSU Athletic Director, or whatever he is. I thought it was extremely shortsighted to fire Miles at this point in the season.
I can't believe I'm seeing Les Miles compared to Bear Bryant. This world, man.
I'm not comparing coaching ability, I am comparing circumstance. For instance, if you believe just repeatedly losing to a team is merit for firing someone, then Bryant should have been fired. I think that's a silly way to go about things though.Now I am not saying those fired coaches are as good as Bryant, but I am saying that both Bowden and Bryant hit a rough patch, and some people gave up on them
And there wasn't a feeling Bryant won his title with a former coaches' players.Was Bear Bryant routinely bringing in the best talent in the country and then falling flat on his face with it? Did he refuse to change, even as the game was changing around him? Was he consistently outclassed by another coach in his own conference? The only similarity is that they both hit a rough patch. Every other variable is different.
That's a really weird question if you think about it. Is it somehow better to not bring in talent and lose? Is that a resolution? There's only a handful of coaches in the country capable of consistently producing top ten classes. This is in fact some of the criticism we did hear about Saban to, I think someone posted something like "I'm tired of seeing Saban losing when he has the most talent on the field" and, that might have just been one loss, but it was the same sentiment. Saban gets extra criticism when he does lose sometimes because of how well he's recruited.Was Bear Bryant routinely bringing in the best talent in the country and then falling flat on his face with it? Did he refuse to change, even as the game was changing around him? Was he consistently outclassed by another coach in his own conference? The only similarity is that they both hit a rough patch. Every other variable is different.
If not for his 2011 season, and sustained success in recruiting (and on the field) I'd tend to agree with that assessment. But, the fact is that 2011 team was all Les Miles, and that team didn't let anyone besides Alabama come within two touchdowns of them. They were one of the best teams of the BCS era. We're talking about a guy who won 44 games over 4 seasons well removed from Nick Saban's recruits. Even Nick Saban can't believe he was fired.And there wasn't a feeling Bryant won his title with a former coaches' players.
Talk about Miles' title as reason for him to stay. Just admit that appearance came with more stars aligning than what Alabama needed in 2011 and 2012 combined.
By most historian's accounts, his talent level seemed to be declining after that near 3peat run. The way it was going in this state, the minority talent base was quickly becoming the center of talent in Alabama and he was having political trouble tapping into it. Once he got Alabama integrated, he went right back to winning.Was Bear Bryant routinely bringing in the best talent in the country and then falling flat on his face with it? Did he refuse to change, even as the game was changing around him? Was he consistently outclassed by another coach in his own conference? The only similarity is that they both hit a rough patch. Every other variable is different.