She's an "analyst" for ESPN so they can check the diversity box. She has a platform and voice with ESPN because she's a woman covering college football. I've watched a few of the CFB shows that she's been on and she literally says nothing. Her "analysis" is always something like this, "Well, you never know what's going to happen with this situation. If team xyz wins out we'll just have to see what the landscape looks like then." She's also been one of the most vocal against Alabama during our dynasty run. You can see the tweets in the article linked by the OP. I made a comment about them in a preseason thread. If Dan Wolken has to explain to you the rationale of why Bama was preseason #1 then you should quit covering college football. She was literally the only person who had a problem with it. I could go on and on about not only the things she's been wrong about but also her continuous flawed logic. /rant
