Well if it is you have an uphill battle since all the people you are counting on to share it have virtually no risk. How much is it helping the risk with all the people that are subsidized?Wrong! It was designed to distribute the risk. Its just not doing that very well yet and needs to be fixed.
If person A isn't paying for it and person B is part of what person B is paying goes toward paying person A's portion of the risk. That in my book is wealth redistribution. Enlighten me as to how it isn't. No offense intended, I just can't see it not being that.
Last edited: