Sidebar

Trump renews threat to prosecute Clinton for joining recount?!

TIDE-HSV

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
84,610
39,827
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
We have officially entered political la-la land...

And so he said he wouldn’t rule it out. He said it’s just not his focus right now. I think he’s being quite magnanimous and at the same time he’s not undercutting at all the authority and the autonomy of the Department of Justice, of the FBI, of the House Committees, who knows where the evidence may lead if, in fact, it were — if the investigation were re-opened somewhere.

But this is the president-elect’s position right now and I would say he has been incredibly gracious and magnanimous to Secretary Clinton at a time when for whatever reason her folks are saying they will join in a recount to try to somehow undo the 70 plus electoral votes that he beat her by. I mean this — you know, I was asked on CNN and elsewhere, goodness a thousand times, will Donald Trump accept the election results? And now you’ve got the Democrats and Jill Stein saying they do not accept the election results. She congratulated him and conceded to him on election night. I was right there. And the idea that we are going to drag this out now where the president-elect has been incredible y magnanimous to the Clintons and to the Obamas is incredible.
Click to expand...
 
Jon

Jon

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2002
15,644
12,568
282
Atlanta 'Burbs
we passed the entrance so long ago its not showing in our rear view mirror any longer. This is just another sign of where we are
 
selmaborntidefan

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
36,432
29,736
287
54
Those of you who voted for these two bear the responsibility, plain and simple. (Btw - kudos to HRC for wasting OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY on a recount). He's a nutjob and she's a devious and ambitiously entitled freak (whose phoniness has extended beyond Election Day despite losing)

I'm also amused by liberals who allegedly care more about income inequality. So you can raise millions overnight for election recounts, but you can't spend that million on a poor person's health care or food or housing? (Hey, y'all are the ones acting all 'compassionate').

Jon's right, too - we left la la land a long time ago.
 
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
58,280
45,069
287
54
East Point, Ga, USA
selmaborntidefan said:
Those of you who voted for these two bear the responsibility, plain and simple. (Btw - kudos to HRC for wasting OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY on a recount). He's a nutjob and she's a devious and ambitiously entitled freak (whose phoniness has extended beyond Election Day despite losing)

I'm also amused by liberals who allegedly care more about income inequality. So you can raise millions overnight for election recounts, but you can't spend that million on a poor person's health care or food or housing? (Hey, y'all are the ones acting all 'compassionate').

Jon's right, too - we left la la land a long time ago.
Click to expand...
i believe you are going to go to your grave thinking hillary peed in your corn flakes
 
CharminTide

CharminTide

Hall of Fame
Oct 23, 2005
7,319
2,032
187
selmaborntidefan said:
Those of you who voted for these two bear the responsibility, plain and simple. (Btw - kudos to HRC for wasting OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY on a recount). He's a nutjob and she's a devious and ambitiously entitled freak (whose phoniness has extended beyond Election Day despite losing)

I'm also amused by liberals who allegedly care more about income inequality. So you can raise millions overnight for election recounts, but you can't spend that million on a poor person's health care or food or housing? (Hey, y'all are the ones acting all 'compassionate').

Jon's right, too - we left la la land a long time ago.
Click to expand...
I'm tired of this false equivalence.

She's a politician with some shady dealings during her decades under public scrutiny and a few errors in judgement, some of which have been profound. But she doesn't carry significantly more corruption than one can expect from a lifelong politician, and she's overall a competent woman and a decent human being who cares about the prosperity and security of the country.

He is an authoritarian, vengeful narcissist with a compulsion to lie. He lacks the composure to hold any public office and has shown no loyalty or accountability toward the voters who put him in office. He values his own personal gain over the well-being of the country. Since the election, he has spent more time watching Infowars and trafficking in disproven conspiracy theories than listening to intelligence briefings. He legitimately doesn't care about national security. The man is a disgrace and embarassment, and his childish ineptitude puts our republic in danger.

You may think both were bad choices, and that's fine. But they were in no way equivalent choices.
 
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
58,280
45,069
287
54
East Point, Ga, USA
CharminTide said:
I'm tired of this false equivalence.

She's a politician with some shady dealings during her decades under public scrutiny and a few errors in judgement, some of which have been profound. But she doesn't carry significantly more corruption than one can expect from a lifelong politician, and she's overall a competent woman and a decent human being who cares about the prosperity and security of the country.

He is an authoritarian, vengeful narcissist with a compulsion to lie. He lacks the composure to hold any public office and has shown no loyalty or accountability toward the voters who put him in office. He values his own personal gain over the well-being of the country. Since the election, he has spent more time watching Infowars and trafficking in disproven conspiracy theories than listening to intelligence briefings. He legitimately doesn't care about national security. The man is a disgrace and embarassment, and his childish ineptitude puts our republic in danger.

You may think both were bad choices, and that's fine. But they were in no way equivalent choices.
Click to expand...
but she is devious and ambitiously entitled. one of those i might be able to forgive, but both? no way in hell mister.
 
dvldog

dvldog

Hall of Fame
Sep 20, 2005
6,570
348
107
72
Virginia
CharminTide said:
I'm tired of this false equivalence.

She's a politician with some shady dealings during her decades under public scrutiny and a few errors in judgement, some of which have been profound. But she doesn't carry significantly more corruption than one can expect from a lifelong politician, and she's overall a competent woman and a decent human being who cares about the prosperity and security of the country.

He is an authoritarian, vengeful narcissist with a compulsion to lie. He lacks the composure to hold any public office and has shown no loyalty or accountability toward the voters who put him in office. He values his own personal gain over the well-being of the country. Since the election, he has spent more time watching Infowars and trafficking in disproven conspiracy theories than listening to intelligence briefings. He legitimately doesn't care about national security. The man is a disgrace and embarassment, and his childish ineptitude puts our republic in danger.

You may think both were bad choices, and that's fine. But they were in no way equivalent choices.
Click to expand...
Thank u Mr Freud.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
M

mrusso

1st Team
Apr 17, 2006
808
344
87
55
CharminTide said:
I'm tired of this false equivalence.

She's a politician with some shady dealings during her decades under public scrutiny and a few errors in judgement, some of which have been profound. But she doesn't carry significantly more corruption than one can expect from a lifelong politician, and she's overall a competent woman and a decent human being who cares about the prosperity and security of the country.

He is an authoritarian, vengeful narcissist with a compulsion to lie. He lacks the composure to hold any public office and has shown no loyalty or accountability toward the voters who put him in office. He values his own personal gain over the well-being of the country. Since the election, he has spent more time watching Infowars and trafficking in disproven conspiracy theories than listening to intelligence briefings. He legitimately doesn't care about national security. The man is a disgrace and embarassment, and his childish ineptitude puts our republic in danger.

You may think both were bad choices, and that's fine. But they were in no way equivalent choices.
Click to expand...
Other than the words he, him, etc., I can't tell which one you're talking about.
 
seebell

seebell

Hall of Fame
Mar 12, 2012
11,919
5,105
187
Gurley, Al
selmaborntidefan said:
Those of you who voted for these two bear the responsibility, plain and simple. (Btw - kudos to HRC for wasting OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY on a recount). He's a nutjob and she's a devious and ambitiously entitled freak (whose phoniness has extended beyond Election Day despite losing)

I'm also amused by liberals who allegedly care more about income inequality. So you can raise millions overnight for election recounts, but you can't spend that million on a poor person's health care or food or housing? (Hey, y'all are the ones acting all 'compassionate').


Jon's right, too - we left la la land a long time ago.
Click to expand...

You sure have been pessimistic, cynical and melancholy of late Selma. Relax and have a cold one!:wink:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Posts

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!

TideFans.shop - Get YOUR Bama Gear HERE!”></a> <br /> <!--/ END TideFans.shop & item link \--> <p style= Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Top Bottom