Could it be Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan and winner of Penn State and Wisconsin game in playoffs? Three Big 10 Teams - ugh!
Question: What if Clemson and Washington lose?
- Thread starter VirginiaTide57
- Start date
Based on what the guy said, Michigan is barley behind Washington, so I would think you are probably right.
Since the committee is interested in getting the four best teams in the playoff I think they would have no problem putting 3 teams from one conference in there if they thought they were the best. Who they think are the best trumps who wins a conference.
Yep, the brand-bias conspiracy would catch fire. Biggest controversy since the 2012 BCS rematch game.
I just don't see 3 big 10 teams in there. 2 at the most. Colorado will get in if that happens or else you are going to start hearing the 6-8 team playoff rants.
But if they put Colorado in you will hear Jim Harbaugh and the entire Michigan fanbase shouting " Hey, we beat Wisconsin , Penn State, AND Colorado."
I really hope the top four wins out to kill out discussion. I mean, it's been fun but let's play football.
Sent from my iPad Pro 12.9" using Tapatalk Roll Tide!
Sent from my iPad Pro 12.9" using Tapatalk Roll Tide!
I'd welcome three Big Ten teams in the playoffs. I haven't seen one B-10 team that could move the football with any consistency against Bama.
Of all the Big 10 teams Michigan is the only one that might concern me. They basically handed the game to Ohio State and that's just a fact.
But, that being said, I'd way rather play a Big 10 team than Clemson or Washington.
Don't matter anyway. We're going to beat whoever we have to.
Of all the Big 10 teams Michigan is the only one that might concern me. They basically handed the game to Ohio State and that's just a fact.
But, that being said, I'd way rather play a Big 10 team than Clemson or Washington.
Don't matter anyway. We're going to beat whoever we have to.
That could happen but would be highly controversial to put two B1G teams in there and leave out the champion, especially since both Wisconsin and Penn State are currently ranked ahead of Colorado.
FiveThirtyEight believes that the B1GCG winner and Colorado would jump Michigan.
This is just one of those weird years like when LSU went to the BCS with two losses. I think Bama, Clemson, a Big 10 team, and Washington should be in if Clemson and Washington win, but who knows what would be right if they lose. If they start comparing two loss teams, championships should matter and losses compared and major victories compared, which is what they will do I'm sure. Three teams from one conference would certainly seem exclusive, however, which is what the committee was supposed to prevent, I thought. I don't think any team with two losses has anything to complain about because it is just a crapshoot at that point.
OMG! Florida wins. VaTech wins Colorado wins. UWhiskey wins. Their are your four conference champs.. Where are the four best teams and where are many of the arguments?
It doesn't appear, based upon the current rankings, the committee has carried through with their earlier punishment of Washington for their terrible non-conference schedule. It doesn't do any good to send a message in week 10 and then ignore said message in week 14.
Should they be placed below a 2 loss team already? To me, they have set up the perfect scenario to leave them out even if they win the PAC
Where is the punishment in that? In is in. Back in week 10 they were undefeated, behind a 1 loss team, and kept outside of the top 4. What's changed? Certainly not the quality of their non-conference schedule.
Latest threads
-
-
-
SIAP there was an article that Joe K interviewed for assistant coach
- Started by mlingerfelt31
- Replies: 11
-
Final Home Midweek for Alabama Brings Samford to The Joe- Started by Diamond Tide
- Replies: 0
-
-
