You're so 20th century. They'll get Sean Hayes to play his mistress.google it. there is a possibility he was poisoned by his wife. they could get a hawt nekkid actress to play his mistress.
You're so 20th century. They'll get Sean Hayes to play his mistress.google it. there is a possibility he was poisoned by his wife. they could get a hawt nekkid actress to play his mistress.
No, because JFK, RFK, and MLK, all had a thing for getting a lot of strange from white women, there is your connection.Were the shootings of Malcolm X and George Wallace related to any of these other shootings?
Yeah I've heard that. But Harding didn't live during a self-absorbed narcissist Baby Boom generation that thinks the world was all nice & innocent until "they" killed "our" President.google it. there is a possibility he was poisoned by his wife. they could get a hawt nekkid actress to play his mistress.
The Carcano isn't a musket. And he was scoped. And that round is light enough to get back on pretty quick. Not fish in a barrel, but in that ballpark.Yeah, and the movement was reasonably steady. I specified "Sharpshooter" because much has been made of the fact that he didn't score Expert on the range while in the Marine Corps. Well, I did, and the Sharpshooters weren't that far behind. It's worth noting that he didn't place all his shots where he wanted, but nailed one shot well. As a matter of fact, I'm not sure his accuracy that day would have earned him a Marksman's badge, much less Sharpshooter or Expert, but hey, it was an Italian rifle. Oswald was no Charles Whitman, but he had enough accuracy that day to change the world.
Why?There is no why in hell, that LHO did not have help.
I'll bite.There is no why in hell, that LHO did not have help.
My main problems with the LHO theory.Why?
Not only was the bullet NOT pristine, but the fact that the bullet was found on the stretcher in the minutes after the shooting proves conclusively there was no conspiracy. Do you really think the guys who were instigating this conspiracy were:My main problems with the LHO theory.
1. The validity of the "Single Bullet" theory and all the associated factors like the pristine bullet found in the stretcher at Parkland.
The autopsy is not the world's best. How exactly this overturns Oswald doing the shooting is something I've never understood - unless you are alleging the autopsy photos are also fake (e.g. the Robert Groden hypothesis)2. The autopsy. There's a lot about that. Pathologists were not experienced at doing autopsies. Chief pathologist missed the throat wound for instance. There's more about it.
ER doctors triage and stabilize patients. They do not get bogged down in the details of forensic pathology. They may have thought that at the time but more sober evaluation proves otherwise. The fact some guys got some stuff on TV wrong doesn't alter the forensics.3. Emergency room doctors who treated Kennedy press conference indicating the throat wound was an entrance wound on the day of the assassination.
Could they have done a better job? Sure. I surmise that had there not been a Presidential election in 1964 their investigation would have taken longer and been more detailed. And it still would have come to the same conclusion.4. The Warren Commission and how they conducted their investigation incising their report.
Now as famous as Oswald, forever bound to him in history. But if you want to say Ruby was supposed to silence Oswald, you have to come up with a plausible reason why he didn't on Friday night when he was there acting as if he was a reporter.5. Jack Ruby.
But those are irrelevant. Even assuming group A or B wanted a President dead, the acting upon it is not going to happen. The notion that JFK is the only President in history who upset the applecart of some powerful people is ridiculous.6. The events that occurred during Kennedy's tenure in office.
Ever seen the x-ray of Connally's wrist? There were a lot of bullet fragments still embedded in him. To me it seems there is more metal in his wrist than is missing from the bullet. And you do know that one of the men who found the bullet on the gurney, Parkland personnel director O.P. Wright, refused to identify the bullet held by the Warren Commission as the one he found at Parkland? The one he found was pointed, the one in the National Archives is rounded.Not only was the bullet NOT pristine, but the fact that the bullet was found on the stretcher in the minutes after the shooting proves conclusively there was no conspiracy. Do you really think the guys who were instigating this conspiracy were:
1) crazy enough to hang around a hosptial in that ruckus and possibly get caught putting the bullet on the stretcher
2) dumb enough to put a pristine one on a stretcher (doesn't common sense dictate you put a DAMAGED bullet on the stretcher if you're trying to fool folks)
3) willing to risk exposing the conspiracy when they didn't know what an investigation was going to show
It was the autopsy for the sitting President of the United States, it should have been the worlds best.The autopsy is not the world's best. How exactly this overturns Oswald doing the shooting is something I've never understood - unless you are alleging the autopsy photos are also fake (e.g. the Robert Groden hypothesis)
He was attended to by Dr. Perry, an Associate Professor of Surgery at UT Southwestern, Dr. Baxter, Associate Professor of Surgery, and Dr. Kemp Clark, Professor of Neurosurgery and the chairman of that department. More than just the normal ER doc's.ER doctors triage and stabilize patients. They do not get bogged down in the details of forensic pathology. They may have thought that at the time but more sober evaluation proves otherwise. The fact some guys got some stuff on TV wrong doesn't alter the forensics.
Again, the death, by violence, of the sitting President of the United States. It should have been a better effort.Could they have done a better job? Sure. I surmise that had there not been a Presidential election in 1964 their investigation would have taken longer and been more detailed. And it still would have come to the same conclusion.
It is funny how many recent stories call Ruby a business man from Chicago, despite the fact he had lived and worked in Dallas since 1947. He was more than a business man. A big hint would be that one of his best friends here in Dallas was "Fat Joe" Campisi. Have you learned enough Dallas history to know what Fat Joe did for a living?Now as famous as Oswald, forever bound to him in history. But if you want to say Ruby was supposed to silence Oswald, you have to come up with a plausible reason why he didn't on Friday night when he was there acting as if he was a reporter.
Might as well add LBJ to that list. It's pretty well documented that he hated the Kennedys.Can we handle the truth? I really would like to know the TRUTH!
Lee Harvey Oswald, Mafia, Castro's cronies, Soviet Union, did I say Mafia, et al. If he acted alone, why did Jack Ruby kill him. Because he, Ruby, loved the President. I just don't think so.
I was sitting in a chemistry class in high school when this happened. I was glued to the TV until he was buried.
Wasn't Hinkley originally from the Dallas area. Didn't he attend high school in the Dallas area and wasn't he a student at Texas Tech? Does that mean that Dallas has a bunch of nuts?I am also starting a conspiracy for Hinkley and Reagan. There is just no way one nut job could do it. and for jodie foster? they expect us to believe this?
I really don't think he had anything to do with it but I don't think he liked being Vice President because he had no powers or influence like he had had in the Senate.Might as well add LBJ to that list. It's pretty well documented that he hated the Kennedys.
He grew up in the Dallas area and went to Highland Park High School and attended Tech.Wasn't Hinkley originally from the Dallas area. Didn't he attend high school in the Dallas area and wasn't he a student at Texas Tech? Does that mean that Dallas has a bunch of nuts?
I think you may be on to something.Wasn't Hinkley originally from the Dallas area. Didn't he attend high school in the Dallas area and wasn't he a student at Texas Tech? Does that mean that Dallas has a bunch of nuts?
Recorded press conference with emergency room doctors at Parkland the day of the shooting stating the throat wound was an entry wound. They testified to the Warren Commission that it was an exit wound. Dallas officials stated that removing Kennedy's body from Texas before autopsy was illegal under Texas law. Feds moved it anyway. Autopsy at Bethesda was conducted by pathologists who had very little experience in conducting autopsies. They were upper level administrators at Bethesda. After completing the autopsy on Friday, the had pathologist called the emergency room doctors the next day. To his chagrin they had totally missed the throat wound on Kennedy as it was impossible for them to re-examine. Throat wound was hidden by a tracheotomy which gives even more credence that the throat wound was an entry wound. Anyway head doctor conducting autopsy burned his notes and autopsy report and created a new report including the throat wound that he never examined. All kinds of military brass overseeing the autopsy. Enough to cast at least some doubt?With the tragic death of the President, I think it kick started the Vietnam conflict. LBJ signed off on it not even five days after JFK was shot. Got to love 'Merica!
Sent from my iPhone