The process of refugee entry into the US explained

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,978
85,002
462
crimsonaudio.net
I wasn't sure what thread to put this in as they all seem fairly specific so I figured I'd start this one.

There are lots of folks who, like me, know little about the process of admitting refugees into the US. One of my friends is friends with the man who posted this, so I was able to see it on his FB wall. The process is far more complex than I thought it was, honestly, and I also had no idea that the 'bump' in the ceiling for next year was only about 15k.

Most of my friends know I practice Immigration law. As such, I have worked with the refugee community for over two decades. This post is long, but if you want actual information about the process, keep reading.

I can not tell you how frustrating it is to see the misinformation and outright lies that are being perpetuated about the refugee process and the Syrian refugees. So, here is a bit of information from the real world of someone who actually works and deals with this issue.

The refugee screening process is multi-layered and is very difficult to get through. Most people languish in temporary camps for months to years while their story is evaluated and checked.

First, you do not get to choose what country you might be resettled into. If you already have family (legal) in a country, that makes it more likely that you will go there to be with family, but other than that it is random. So, you can not simply walk into a refugee camp, show a document, and say, I want to go to America. Instead, the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees) works with the local authorities to try to take care of basic needs. Once the person/family is registered to receive basic necessities, they can be processed for resettlement. Many people are not interested in resettlement as they hope to return to their country and are hoping that the turmoil they fled will be resolved soon. In fact, most refugees in refugee events never resettle to a third country. Those that do want to resettle have to go through an extensive process.

Resettlement in the U.S. is a long process and takes many steps. The Refugee Admissions Program is jointly administered by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) in the Department of State, the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and offices within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) within DHS conducts refugee interviews and determines individual eligibility for refugee status in the United States.

We evaluate refugees on a tiered system with three levels of priority.

First Priority are people who have suffered compelling persecution or for whom no other durable solution exists. These individuals are referred to the United States by UNHCR, or they are identified by the U.S. embassy or a non-governmental organization (NGO).

Second priority are groups of “special concern” to the United States. The Department of State determines these groups, with input from USCIS, UNHCR, and designated NGOs. At present, we prioritize certain persons from the former Soviet Union, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Iran, Burma, and Bhutan.

Third priority are relatives of refugees (parents, spouses, and unmarried children under 21) who are already settled in the United States may be admitted as refugees. The U.S.-based relative must file an Affidavit of Relationship (AOR) and must be processed by DHS.

Before being allowed to come to the United States, each refugee must undergo an extensive interviewing, screening, and security clearance process conducted by Regional Refugee Coordinators and overseas Resettlement Support Centers (RSCs). Individuals generally must not already be firmly resettled (a legal term of art that would be a separate article). Just because one falls into the three priorities above does not guarantee admission to the United States.

The Immigration laws require that the individuals prove that they have a “well-founded fear,” (another legal term which would be a book.) This fear must be proved regardless of the person’s country, circumstance, or classification in a priority category. There are multiple interviews and people are challenged on discrepancies. I had a client who was not telling the truth on her age and the agency challenged her on it. Refugees are not simply admitted because they have a well founded fear. They still must show that they are not subject to exclusion under Section 212(a) of the INA. These grounds include serious health matters, moral or criminal matters, as well as security issues. In addition, they can be excluded for such things as polygamy, misrepresentation of facts on visa applications, smuggling, or previous deportations. Under some circumstances, the person may be eligible to have the ground waived.

At this point, a refugee can be conditionally accepted for resettlement. Then, the RSC sends a request for assurance of placement to the United States, and the Refugee Processing Center (RPC) works with private voluntary agencies (VOLAG) to determine where the refugee will live. If the refugee does have family in the U.S., efforts will be made to resettle close to that family.

Every person accepted as a refugee for planned admission to the United States is conditional upon passing a medical examination and passing all security checks. Frankly, there is more screening of refugees than ever happens to get on an airplane. Of course, yes, no system can be 100% foolproof. But if that is your standard, then you better shut down the entire airline industry, close the borders, and stop all international commerce and shipping. Every one of those has been the source of entry of people and are much easier ways to gain access to the U.S. Only upon passing all of these checks (which involve basically every agency of the government involved in terrorist identification) can the person actually be approved to travel.

Before departing, refugees sign a promissory note to repay the United States for their travel costs. This travel loan is an interest-free loan that refugees begin to pay back six months after arriving in the country.

Once the VOLAG is notified of the travel plans, it must arrange for the reception of refugees at the airport and transportation to their housing at their final destination.
This process from start to finish averages 18 to 24 months, but I have seen it take years.

The reality is that about half of the refugees are children, another quarter are elderly. Almost all of the adults are either moms or couples coming with children. Each year the President, in consultation with Congress, determines the numerical ceiling for refugee admissions. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, the proposed ceiling is 85,000. We have been averaging about 70,000 a year for the last number of years. (Source: Refugee Processing Center)

Over one-third of all refugee arrivals (35.1 percent, or 24,579) in FY 2015 came from the Near East/South Asia—a region that includes Iraq, Iran, Bhutan, and Afghanistan.
Another third of all refugee arrivals (32.1 percent, or 22,472) in FY 2015 came from Africa.
Over a quarter of all refugee arrivals (26.4 percent, or 18,469) in FY 2015 came from East Asia — a region that includes China, Vietnam, and Indonesia. (Source: Refugee Processing Center)

Finally, the process in Europe is different. I would be much more concerned that terrorists are infiltrating the European system because they are not nearly so extensive and thorough in their process.
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,805
19,179
337
Hooterville, Vir.
I wasn't sure what thread to put this in as they all seem fairly specific so I figured I'd start this one.

There are lots of folks who, like me, know little about the process of admitting refugees into the US. One of my friends is friends with the man who posted this, so I was able to see it on his FB wall. The process is far more complex than I thought it was, honestly, and I also had no idea that the 'bump' in the ceiling for next year was only about 15k.
Thanks for that.
1. Not sure how a security screen works when the country from which the refugee is coming has no functioning government (e.g. Syria, Somalia, maybe Libya.)
2. Wonder how many actually pay back their interest-free loan for airfare.
3. This process makes it sound like the refugee is spending the waiting period in a refugee camp under UNHCR control until the screening is completed.
 

Jon

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2002
16,447
15,057
282
Atlanta 'Burbs
I wasn't sure what thread to put this in as they all seem fairly specific so I figured I'd start this one.

There are lots of folks who, like me, know little about the process of admitting refugees into the US. One of my friends is friends with the man who posted this, so I was able to see it on his FB wall. The process is far more complex than I thought it was, honestly, and I also had no idea that the 'bump' in the ceiling for next year was only about 15k.
This is a great post. I hope all are reading it
 

AV8N

1st Team
Sep 18, 2013
751
0
35
Great read!

So does that mean that the 10k that are supposedly going to be here within the next year are already in the pipeline? I've read that a lot of refugees have been staying in places like Turkey for a while now.

Also, if half of the refugees are children and a quarter are elderly, can we assume that 50-75% of the refugees are not required to repay their travel expenses within six months?
 

CrimsonNagus

Hall of Fame
Jun 6, 2007
9,783
8,763
212
46
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
I get that this is the normal process but, isn't the Obama administration trying to fast track some of these new Syrian refugees? Isn't that the whole problem that has everyone upset? Following the normal process is fine with me but, don't fast track anything for this group of people, that's when things will slip through your fingers.
 

Bodhisattva

Hall of Fame
Aug 22, 2001
22,456
3,962
287
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
Off topic ..... This was many years ago, but my wife and her sisters and brother cooled their heels in a Thai refugee camp for two years after escaping Vietnam. (Made it out of the country on their second attempt.) They dodged beatings, rape, and murder for two years by never going out alone or at night because the soldiers that protected you during the day were the ones that preyed on you at night. My wife and her siblings witnessed much brutality and suicides, as the refugees that were ultimately denied passage to the US and other places gave up hope.
 
Last edited:

OreBama

All-American
Sep 26, 2005
3,349
5
57
Portland, OR
Looking back, I'm sure the American Indians are glad they let all those disease-carrying white people into their lands. It has worked out great for them. They have specially assigned areas in which to live and casinos, oh, and almost unlimited denim jackets.
 

mittman

All-American
Jun 19, 2009
3,942
0
0
Thanks for the post.

I knew a lot of this, but not all, and what I did know formed my opinion in earlier threads. This is why I am not one of the people who think we need to refuse refugees who make it through that process. Those that want to make the process tougher or refuse to take them appear to me to be pure political showboating. I would much rather take my chances with those and spend my time, money and energy in attempts to block those that try to get here outside the process.

Certainly some are going to slip through any process. Certainly some are going to get here, not be the problem themselves, but provide material support for those that are. Any government's first priority is protection of it's citizenry. Taking in too many is obviously ill advised. That number is IMO unknowable. Also, I am not one of those that think we are in any way obligated. I just don't have a problem with taking some even knowing we have plenty of people already here that are a burden.

My big problems with this lie on both sides of the isle.
 
My thing is this. I know everyone is being screened and whatever, but our "enemies" can still pass through undetected with the influx of refugees. You don't think the enemy is scoping out this way of getting in?

Also, I'm not so sure that the ones that are taking haven in the States aren't as radical as the others. They are just outnumbered over in Syria.

It's really hard thinking about this because one of the areas they are coming to is the Gulf Coast.

Still they need a place to go. It's scary thinking about this.

Still I have to think about the veterans as well and how nothing is being done to help them.
 

Displaced Bama Fan

Hall of Fame
Jun 5, 2000
23,343
39
167
Shiner, TX
My thing is this. I know everyone is being screened and whatever, but our "enemies" can still pass through undetected with the influx of refugees. You don't think the enemy is scoping out this way of getting in?

Also, I'm not so sure that the ones that are taking haven in the States aren't as radical as the others. They are just outnumbered over in Syria.

It's really hard thinking about this because one of the areas they are coming to is the Gulf Coast.

Still they need a place to go. It's scary thinking about this.

Still I have to think about the veterans as well and how nothing is being done to help them.
They just need to go home and fight for their freedom whatever that may be.
 

Gr8hope

All-American
Nov 10, 2010
3,408
1
60
And this vetting process is administered by the same crowd thats brings us the stellar VA system for our vets.
...and ignores established laws on immigration ...and lies about almost everything including healthcare & economic stats. Pardon me if I have no faith in their vetting. Barack Obama has never been properly vetted for the American people.

They tell us we have nothing to worry about while they have increased security around themselves.

CA, I know there are good people who work in government positions but they have been inhibited in many of their duties by an ideologue who has an agenda.
 

Gr8hope

All-American
Nov 10, 2010
3,408
1
60
They just need to go home and fight for their freedom whatever that may be.

We can offer them aid without bringing them here.
The allowed invasion of so many illegals and refugees is to give the leftists a larger voting block. Don't believe that? Ask yourself who benefits from bringing them here.
 
It's so easy to say and I wholeheartedly agree with you. I just know it isn't so simple for them. It goes by ideologies and I don't think there is a resolution to this. One ideology says one thing and you seemingly have two factions that are trying to carry it out in different ways, but still having the same result. It's just one has more on its side than the other.

We have radical Muslims all over the US. They are spewing propaganda and nobody is seeming to notice it for some reason. Their religion says they should murder unbelievers, strange because they US is predominantly made up of the non-believers their book says should be murdered.
They just need to go home and fight for their freedom whatever that may be.
 

Bamaro

TideFans Legend
Oct 19, 2001
28,908
14,311
287
Jacksonville, Md USA
We can offer them aid without bringing them here.
The allowed invasion of so many illegals and refugees is to give the leftists a larger voting block. Don't believe that? Ask yourself who benefits from bringing them here.
Ask yourself how they can vote without citizenship first.
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
24,805
19,179
337
Hooterville, Vir.
I'll say that. If muslim immigrants voted Republican by an 80%-20% margin, there would be no discussion of admitting Syrian refugees at all, much less increasing the number admitted.
 

Al A Bama

Hall of Fame
Jun 24, 2011
6,665
946
132
We can offer them aid without bringing them here.
The allowed invasion of so many illegals and refugees is to give the leftists a larger voting block. Don't believe that? Ask yourself who benefits from bringing them here.
I think most Americans are naive regarding this entire situation. You read about that Process posted at the beginning of this thread, but how EFFECTIVELY is that Process IMPLEMENTED? It is being implemented by imperfect human beings?

How long will it be before we have a population comparable to China and India? If it weren't for abortions, we'd be even closer. Yes, I know we have about 322+ million people according to the Population Clock and those two countries have over a Billion each, but how many can we effectively house with JOBS, NOT welfare?

Give us your tired, etc. but do NOT give us your terrorists!

Are members of the Republican Party the only REAL Terrorists in the world? Are Republicans the REAL enemy of this country. According to Progressives, I guess it is/they are.