They didn't convert third downs all day long.
They converted 9 of 18. Our defense got enough stops to win the game, despite such "poor" tackling, and as the article astutely points out, we seemed to fold up on defense after the offense kept putting them back on the field and the snap count got so out of hand against them.
Frankly, we were not healthy enough at LB, despite the guys being back, and Auburn exploited that wonderfully. Give them credit.
We did not exploit their weaknesses on defense well enough, and I'll agree that's on the coaches. But I don't think we're in as bad of shape as everyone else seems to. If we can catch a couple of breaks this weekend and get into the playoff and get healed up, I like our chances as good or better than any other team out there.
Just my 2 cents - and a "Peanut Gallery" opinion, but I SUSPECT that if someone had told us, last Friday, that we would hold aub's offense to 26 points (more than 10 points BELOW their season average prior to last weekend), I bet MOST of us would have assumed that meant we'd get a 3-10 point WIN.
26 was their LOWEST score since their LSux game (23 vs. LSux) and 3rd lowest scoring of the season, after only Clempson and LSux. AND we did it with a Defense DECIMATED by multiple injuries to key players.
So While we ALL Agree that our Defense didn't seem to play all that well, and certainly was capable of a much better performance - I'm NOT sure we could really say that the Defense was the "Weak Link" in our game, or necessarily "Cost" us the win.
By the same token, we did really seriously BOTCH one fairly long FG attempt - and that was just a five-star disaster of a screw up. So we can't say "Special Teams" played anywhere close to their capability. But by the same token, we had one realy GOOD KO return, and otherwise decent KO and Punt returns (didn't put the ball on the ground, at least), really good punting, good PAT's. So I'm NOT sure we could really say that the Special Teams overall was the "Weak Link" in our game, or necessarily "Cost" us the win.
That leaves the Offense. . . . .
27 points - All we needed to win - WOULD have been near our season LOW on Offense. We've (previously) failed to hit 27 points only TWICE this year- and both times we scored 24 - against FRU in the opener and LSux. 14 was BY FAR our Season LOW in scoring, and in fact, Prior to Saturday, going back to the start of the
2008 season, Nick Saban's teams had been held to 14 points or less scored only FOUR TIMES in
TEN seasons.
LSu in 2016 - 10 pts; Ark in 2014 - 14 pts; LSu in the 2011 reg season game - 6 pts; Tenn in 2009 - 12 pts.
The last time aub held us to 14 or less was 2007. And that includes TWO subsequent barn teams that paid.. errr. I mean "Played" in NC games.
Soooooo.........