And how many are currently on NFL rosters? That's how we were able to do it.We really struggled to get to the QB this year. We must find some DL that can rush and pressure the QB. We were burned almost every time when we blitz the LB’s against Auburn. Last year we could rush only 4
Far easier said than done. D line guys of the Jonathan Allan variety only come along once in a great while. They are like gold.We really struggled to get to the QB this year. We must find some DL that can rush and pressure the QB. We were burned almost every time when we blitz the LB’s against Auburn. Last year we could rush only 4
That's all I will say on this.“There is about eight or nine things that affect the outcome of a game, and sacks don’t really do that,” he said. “It does affect drives, but it does not affect the outcome of a game. But in affecting quarterbacks, I look at pushing the pocket, not letting the guy step up in the pocket and make throws downfield is really significant in playing good pass defense and being a pass rush team.”
We got schooled in so many ways. Never thought I`d say that about a CNS team.And how many are currently on NFL rosters? That's how we were able to do it.
It's an area of improvement no doubt. Auburn did what we didn't do - quick passes. That's why the pass rush was negated. Stidham didn't hold the ball long.
We got schooled in so many ways. Never thought I`d say that about a CNS team.
Playcalling was atrocious. Execution was poor.Well, we didn't really get schooled. We just didn't executed the gaps, the assignments, and other stuff very well. Do it right and Bama wins. It's really about poor execution on Defense.
Schooled isn't the right adjective. We schooled Ole Miss and Vandy. We defeated Tennessee soundly and we controlled the game against LSU. (obviously just my opinions on how those different adjectives fit our performance.)We got schooled in so many ways. Never thought I`d say that about a CNS team.
OK. Sure felt like we got out coached, though.Schooled isn't the right adjective. We schooled Ole Miss and Vandy. We defeated Tennessee soundly and we controlled the game against LSU. (obviously just my opinions on how those different adjectives fit our performance.)
I'd say Auburn controlled the game against us. But if anything we tripped over our own feet a few times and had the wrong game plan on offense going in.
It's easy to get into the weeds but overall I'd say we're a few healthy players and 1 different gameplan away from walking into our 4th consecutive SEC championship game.
Too much doom and gloom for my taste.
I would add unfocused and sloppy football.Playcalling was atrocious. Execution was poor.
Before all of our injuries to Linemen we had the ability to pass rush. It takes speed. We lost a step with unfamiliar guys coming in the line. We lost our Field General too and that hurt.We really struggled to get to the QB this year. We must find some DL that can rush and pressure the QB. We were burned almost every time when we blitz the LB’s against Auburn. Last year we could rush only 4
Our pressure almost always comes from the LBs. Allen was the exception to the rule, but even then the OLBs generated way more sacks and pressures than the true DL.I think a lot of our pass rush was hindered by the linebacker injuries. While it's great to have athletically gifted defensive ends, I think coming into this year we knew that the pressure was going to have to come from our linebackers. Unfortunately, that's the area that we were killed in as far as injuries.
The reason Bama did not do this versus Auburn exploiting the quick passing game was that Auburn knew we would be blitzing LB's and voiding certain areas of the field, especially on third downs, due to the fact that our 3 to 4 down linemen could not consistently generate a pass rush. To create a pass rush, Bama has to blitz from somewhere. Credit Auburn and Stidham for diagnosing where the blitz was coming from and when it was coming. Also, Auburn had no trouble all season with rushing the quarterback with their front 4. Just Like Bama last season. Its a luxury Bama simply didn't have this season after the injuries to Miller and Lewis. So, Auburn didn't leave as many voided areas in the defense by needing to blitz LB's. A quick passing game would've helped Bama at some points during the game, but I'm not sure it would have been the difference.And how many are currently on NFL rosters? That's how we were able to do it.
It's an area of improvement no doubt. Auburn did what we didn't do - quick passes. That's why the pass rush was negated. Stidham didn't hold the ball long.
What he said...^Well, we didn't really get schooled. We just didn't executed the gaps, the assignments, and other stuff very well. Do it right and Bama wins. It's really about poor execution on Defense.
I think we usually have had a capable defensive end in pass rush, this year was going to be a little different relying more on linebackers than a true pass rusher on the endOur pressure almost always comes from the LBs. Allen was the exception to the rule, but even then the OLBs generated way more sacks and pressures than the true DL.
Not really. Allen has been the exception. Of the top 10 season sack stats under saban, only three are DL. Two of them belong to Allen (1st and tied for 2nd) and Dareus is 10th. All the rest are LBs like Anderson, Williams, Dickson and Upshaw. The last three years, the LB's have contributed more sacks than the DL also, even though it's been close a couple of years.I think we usually have had a capable defensive end in pass rush, this year was going to be a little different relying more on linebackers than a true pass rusher on the end
The defensive ends though have a lot more to do with sacks than the numbers recorded. Pressure on the ends forcing the qb or breakdown of the play allows the linebackers to have a field day in the middle, if you're using blitz packages, then that is especially designed for linebacker sacks. We even use our linebackers as defensive end hybrids , so it really has a lot to do.with how you are using your defensive schemes. When I played college football, our coach would always award nonsacks to the guys who forced the play into a resulting sack. It was kind of an unofficial acknowledgment of a play or player.Not really. Allen has been the exception. Of the top 10 season sack stats under saban, only three are DL. Two of them belong to Allen (1st and tied for 2nd) and Dareus is 10th. All the rest are LBs like Anderson, Williams, Dickson and Upshaw. The last three years, the LB's have contributed more sacks than the DL also, even though it's been close a couple of years.