Me too.I'm glad I wasn't the only one. I re-read the OP 3 times trying to find a reference to the Ducks before I figured it out.
Me too.I'm glad I wasn't the only one. I re-read the OP 3 times trying to find a reference to the Ducks before I figured it out.
I actually think she’s angling for a godamighty settlement (which, I have zero doubt, she deserves), and correctly feels that putting the claims in federal jurisdiction, and the threat of it’s no-nonsense subpoena processes, is the best way to get there.It could just be a philosophical argument to the judge that a group of people all working for the same entity, committing various crimes would qualify as a “criminal organization “ and thus make available stiffer penalties for the individuals because of the idea they work together.
She’s trying to nuke them from orbit to be sure.
So we’re responsible for a dozen LSU officials ignoring Title IX to the point that a victim is filing a suit under RICO, which was designed for organized crime.one of the baws at the LSU forum, possibly the Ogre himself, has this to say:
View attachment 15891
Yes, yes we are attempting to bring down the program that we've ***checks notes*** beaten 9 out of the last 10 in football and 9 out of the last 12 in basketball.one of the baws at the LSU forum, possibly the Ogre himself, has this to say:
View attachment 15891
Well my buddy was flying a REC Black Helicopter in Louisiana the other day, and.........where’s the blue font button.one of the baws at the LSU forum, possibly the Ogre himself, has this to say:
View attachment 15891
He's literally not smart enough to understand. Seriously. Orgeron is an unfathomably stupid man.Oeaux might be sweating bullets right now..............
I'd say she received some first class legal advice.It could just be a philosophical argument to the judge that a group of people all working for the same entity, committing various crimes would qualify as a “criminal organization “ and thus make available stiffer penalties for the individuals because of the idea they work together.
She’s trying to nuke them from orbit to be sure.
Well, there's another thing on Ogre and that is he covered for Derrius Guice after he supposedly propositioned a female security guard in the Superdome. O claims a man called him and said the guard either wanted $100,000 or for Guice to sit out the Citrus Bowl as punishment. The female guard claims that O called her trying to arrange an apology, and her daughter backed up the claim. She said there was no mistaking that "cajun frog" voice on the phone.He's literally not smart enough to understand. Seriously. Orgeron is an unfathomably stupid man.
He’d better hope there is someone smart enough to inform him of what he’s facing...... I know The Who’s are already blaming Bama for all of this, but a quick look in the mirror will reveal the culpritHe's literally not smart enough to understand. Seriously. Orgeron is an unfathomably stupid man.
I still can't get why we would care. We dominate them on the field and court. They are not a primary rival.He’d better hope there is someone smart enough to inform him of what he’s facing...... I know The Who’s are already blaming Bama for all of this, but a quick look in the mirror will reveal the culprit
Probably shouldn’t care...... but after their glee at Bama’s troubles, what goes around comes back aroundI still can't get why we would care. We dominate them on the field and court. They are not a primary rival.
The only angle I can figure, if I'm being completely open minded to the possibility, is that we do enjoy recruiting in Louisiana.
Yet, just as you say, they need to look in the mirror. They are the ones who've done this stuff. And just like I feel I have a right to be angry with with what Fulmer et. al. did during our fiasco in the 2000s, I have to be honest and say we screwed up, we did commit penalties, and had we behaved properly Fulmer never would have had the ability to do what he did. Then the ncaa never would have had the open door to screw us like they did.
Did it work? Tough to proveThe "civil RICO" statute says "Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of [the criminal RICO statute]may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee..."
When I was an attorney with the Air Force, we and DOJ considered using this against several defense contractors for defrauding the government.
I didn't know RICO had a civil aspect, and certainly didn't know about the treble damages.The "civil RICO" statute says "Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of [the criminal RICO statute]may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee..."
When I was an attorney with the Air Force, we and DOJ considered using this against several defense contractors for defrauding the government.
My recollection is that DOJ may have used it as a threat to bring them to the table. (If someone is found guilty of criminal RICO, they lose their company to the government.) It usually worked.Did it work? Tough to prove