Just curious if auburn TP'd toomer's corner today?
Looks like they did not... Surprisingly classy of them. Must be trying to get in good with Hugh Freeze?Just curious if auburn TP'd toomer's corner today?
I, too, do not want the Big Ten to win anything because I remember the days when that is all you heard about. But, the prospect of UGA going back to back trumps any prejudices I harbor against the Big Ten. I can't root for TCU, because they shouldn't be there. Same for Bucky. So, Go Blue, I guess. I feel dirty, now.I don't want Georgia to win a second title in a row I don't want OSU or Michigan to win because I don't want the Big Ten to win anything, so I guess I'm left pulling for TCU.
You know how Aubie is. They probably intentionally lost games these past two years to not effect the TP supply chain.Looks like they did not... Surprisingly classy of them. Must be trying to get in good with Hugh Freeze?
Do you think uga or the rest of the SEC is pulling for us to win the Sugar Bowl?If they had paired TCU with GA like they should have, I'd be pulling for TCU. I just find this anti-SEC bias appalling.
Oh HELL no!!Do you think uga or the rest of the SEC is pulling for us to win the Sugar Bowl?
No, of course not. But I wouldn't want the Committee to do us this way. I know that they would have rather had USC over TCU and tried their best only for Lincoln Reilly to soil the bed; not once but TWICE. Still, I would have been OK if they could have found a way to place Mich at #1 and GA at #2. But they knew that was impossible. Still, they rewarded mediocrity. GA runs the table and doesn't buy their way out of games and their reward is the most difficult path, at least on paper. Maybe TCU is better than OSU. I know if it was us instead of GA, I'd be on the warpath. Maybe you'd be cool with it?Do you think uga or the rest of the SEC is pulling for us to win the Sugar Bowl?
Of course it would bother me if it were us, but it isn't. That doesn't make me want uga to win anything ever. What they should have done is put michigan at #1 after they blew out ohio state.No, of course not. But I wouldn't want the Committee to do us this way. I know that they would have rather had USC over TCU and tried their best only for Lincoln Reilly to soil the bed; not once but TWICE. Still, I would have been OK if they could have found a way to place Mich at #1 and GA at #2. But they knew that was impossible. Still, they rewarded mediocrity. GA runs the table and doesn't buy their way out of games and their reward is the most difficult path, at least on paper. Maybe TCU is better than OSU. I know if it was us instead of GA, I'd be on the warpath. Maybe you'd be cool with it?