Here is a report from Reuters (which in my view is one of the best sources of news in the US). Even then, you have to parse words carefully.
U.S. intelligence assesses Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 casualties -source
315,000 casualties, which includes wounded as well as dead.
Then Reuters points out that this figure represents 87% of the men in the Russian army when the invasion. But these casualties are not amongst the same 360,00 men. Russia conscripts around 260,00 new men/year (254k in 2022 and 277k in 2023). Guys who survive their conscription period move on.
Then the article lists Ukrainian deaths (not including wounded) as 70,000. The normal ratio wounded to dead is around 3:1, so 210,000 wounded or 280,000 Ukrainian casualties total. 280,000 compared to 315,000 is not enough for Ukraine to win.
U.S. intelligence assesses Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 casualties -source
315,000 casualties, which includes wounded as well as dead.
Then Reuters points out that this figure represents 87% of the men in the Russian army when the invasion. But these casualties are not amongst the same 360,00 men. Russia conscripts around 260,00 new men/year (254k in 2022 and 277k in 2023). Guys who survive their conscription period move on.
Then the article lists Ukrainian deaths (not including wounded) as 70,000. The normal ratio wounded to dead is around 3:1, so 210,000 wounded or 280,000 Ukrainian casualties total. 280,000 compared to 315,000 is not enough for Ukraine to win.


