Mark Ingram talks about Kirby’s shove

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,224
52,990
287
55
East Point, Ga, USA

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
46,481
36,893
287
Vinings, ga., usa
he said he would have kicked kirby’s ass :LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO:


and the incompetent refs would have only seen the reaction and kicked Mark out of the game. The media would have only talked about the reaction and not the initial shove that caused it and would have reminded us all that his father is in prison.
 

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,696
84,318
462
crimsonaudio.net
I don't think Kirby was intentionally targeting the player, I think he was just shoving whoever was in his way out of his way so he could get to his DC.

That said, Danny Kanell correctly pointed out that if the player had done this to Kirby, he would have immediately been hit with an unsportsmanlike penalty (rightfully so).

So while this wasn't egregious, nor do I think it was done with malice, there has to be some response from the SEC - even if it's just a fine. Sankey has to do something...

But he won't.
 

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
46,481
36,893
287
Vinings, ga., usa
I don't think Kirby was intentionally targeting the player, I think he was just shoving whoever was in his way out of his way so he could get to his DC.

That said, Danny Kanell correctly pointed out that if the player had done this to Kirby, he would have immediately been hit with an unsportsmanlike penalty (rightfully so).

So while this wasn't egregious, nor do I think it was done with malice, there has to be some response from the SEC - even if it's just a fine. Sankey has to do something...

But he won't.
Sanky issued a statement that basically said nothing.
 

dayhiker

FB|BB Moderator
Staff member
Dec 8, 2000
9,352
5,680
337
Pell City, AL
I don't think Kirby was intentionally targeting the player, I think he was just shoving whoever was in his way out of his way so he could get to his DC.

That said, Danny Kanell correctly pointed out that if the player had done this to Kirby, he would have immediately been hit with an unsportsmanlike penalty (rightfully so).

So while this wasn't egregious, nor do I think it was done with malice, there has to be some response from the SEC - even if it's just a fine. Sankey has to do something...

But he won't.
It's really telling that he would shove any player on a sideline in that way.
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,183
27,864
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
He should have been suspended for a game and fined $250,000. I'm utterly shocked nothing was done about this. No way Kirby didn't see him and no way "he didn't remember it". That is complete horsecrap.

It's been a while since I've "accidentally" shoved somebody (how the video showed he did) and "couldn't remember it". COME'ON MAN!!!!
 
Last edited:

bamaga

Hall of Fame
Apr 29, 2002
14,853
10,382
282
JAWJA
I don't think Kirby was intentionally targeting the player, I think he was just shoving whoever was in his way out of his way so he could get to his DC.

That said, Danny Kanell correctly pointed out that if the player had done this to Kirby, he would have immediately been hit with an unsportsmanlike penalty (rightfully so).

So while this wasn't egregious, nor do I think it was done with malice, there has to be some response from the SEC - even if it's just a fine. Sankey has to do something...

But he won't.
Agree 100%
 

Latest threads