Trump Policies, part IX

  • HELLO AGAIN, Guest! We are back, live! We're still doing some troubleshooting and maintenance to fix a few remaining issues but everything looks stable now (except front page which we're working on over next day or two)

    Thanks for your patience and support! MUCH appreciated! --Brett (BamaNation)

    if you see any problems - please post them in the Troubleshooting board!

“You know, the new thing is magnets. So instead of using hydraulic that can be hit by lightning and it’s fine. You take a little glass of water, you drop it on magnets, I don’t know what’s going to happen,” Trump said.

“So, you know, the elevators come up in the new carriers—I think I’m going to change it, by the way—they have magnets. Every tractor has hydraulic, every excavator, every excavating machine of any kind has hydraulic. But somebody decided to use magnets.”

 

bafkreibbg2jn3vqmkziwcs3j3q7nplee5txajjmpmpb2z4g3rgdisd6yee@jpeg
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: some_al_fan and UAH
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg
My suspicion on this whole SNAP thing (in particular) is that at the 11th hour, Chief TACO is going to position himself in some way that cuts off the legs of his the clowns in his own party who have been dumb enough to trust him while he simultaneously blames the Democrats but presents himself as a reasonable hands-on leader.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: UAH
My suspicion on this whole SNAP thing (in particular) is that at the 11th hour, Chief TACO is going to position himself in some way that cuts off the legs of his the clowns in his own party who have been dumb enough to trust him while he simultaneously blames the Democrats but presents himself as a reasonable hands-on leader.
it does follow his simpleton approach to things: create problem, blame others, "fix" problem, take credit
 
Washington Post gift link

Trump administration uses misleading videos to portray chaos, push deportations


Official videos purporting to show the triumph of recent immigration operations used footage that was months old or recorded thousands of miles away, a Washington Post analysis found.





I know how many of you feel about the media, but if I was was forced to choose, I’d trust any of the major networks and newspapers before I’d believe one word coming from the Trump Administration. There’s not an official government website, press release, or statement that can be taken seriously.

Have you seen the official White House site? Scroll down and take a look at the Major Events Timeline.

 
The world loves Trump, not because he's perfect, but because he's authentic.

Charles Manson was authentic.


This argument seriously reminds me of the "John Kerry served in the military" talking point. As the late comedian Tim Wilson said (I'll clean it up), "So did Lee Harvey Oswald. So did Benedict Arnold. My cousin was in Vietnam, he's framing houses in North Georgia (answers to DzynKing), I don't want him being President."
 
His base historically has been 30%-35% of the voting public. This is only one issue but a major one. He is losing/lost all but his most hard-core supporters. Rather than segment based on party affiliation. They should attempt segment this based on household income status.

With these numbers, the voters are literally on their hands and knees begging the Democrats to present a reasonable alternative. To which they will only offer more micro-culture issues to vote on.

If there ever was an opportunity for a third party to bust onto the scene this is it.
 

Tapper: Reuters found the Trump organization's income from the first half of this year shot from $51 million to $864 million, about $800 million of that is from crypto. And the story details how most of the buyers are foreign investors and all how all this money is going to belong to Trump when he leaves office. Is this something that you're going to look into at all?

Comer: The difference between the way the Trump family operate and the Biden family is they're admitting they're doing this. The president campaigned as a business guy. So as long as you disclose your income and disclose the sources, I think that's acceptable.
 
Charles Manson was authentic.


This argument seriously reminds me of the "John Kerry served in the military" talking point. As the late comedian Tim Wilson said (I'll clean it up), "So did Lee Harvey Oswald. So did Benedict Arnold. My cousin was in Vietnam, he's framing houses in North Georgia (answers to DzynKing), I don't want him being President."
Tim Wilson was absolute greatness. I wish he was still around to offer commentary on everything happening today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: selmaborntidefan
His base historically has been 30%-35% of the voting public. This is only one issue but a major one. He is losing/lost all but his most hard-core supporters. Rather than segment based on party affiliation. They should attempt segment this based on household income status.

With these numbers, the voters are literally on their hands and knees begging the Democrats to present a reasonable alternative. To which they will only offer more micro-culture issues to vote on.

If there ever was an opportunity for a third party to bust onto the scene this is it.
Lotsa truth here. Dems keep talking about "offering an alternative", but alternative to what, exactly?

  • Securing the border?
  • Cracking down on inner-city crime?
  • Promoting affordable energy production?
  • Trying to force a peace deal in the Middle East?
  • Insisting foreign leaders to open their markets to American-made products?
  • Prioritizing a strong military over absurd DEI quotas?
The problem is that most Americans are in favor of these things and when that is the case, making moves against these issues is a losing proposition. Wanna know what an "alternative" to these issues looks like? One only needs to examine the catastrophe that was the Biden administration. Americans might not be the brightest bulbs in the pack, but they knew a Harris admin wouldn't be any different. (This was pretty obvious when she was asked how her administration would differ from Biden's and she couldn't think of a single answer.) Not surprisingly, she got hammered in the election and I can only imagine what the numbers would have looked like had the Reps run anyone other than Trump.

Instead, what the Dems OUGHT to be doing is offering an alterative to the processes in place to get better results, NOT different results. Of course, the Dems would have to deal with the fallout from the far-left, but so what? I think the influence these loons carry is way overstated anyway. Polling shows historically bad numbers for the Dem party as a whole and you're not going to fix that by catering to a bunch of idiots who have never been particularly dependable for showing up to vote anyway.
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Latest threads