If you're saying she's a shill, I don't believe it. I think the answer is her change of lawyers. Did you notice that the portions that were hearsay could be backed up by calling the originator (Angle, in the case of the limo scene.) The other guy was a Trump favorite who was appointed to the job, not a true SS guy and the executive director of communications who's now a CNN reporter said tonight nothing he said could be believed, unless he were under oath. The counter-attacks on her, I would note, are also not under oath. Tucker Carlson devoted the evening to UFOs. There will be more to come, particularly after her testimony...So, I have read all this and I am spellbound. Yet, part of me wonders if the CH testimony was intended to poison the credibility of the hearings, meaning was the committee duped into putting this person up due to the obvious salaciousness of her testimony?
A good portion of the testimony provided by the J6 cmte so far is technically hearsay as these are out of court statements. Some of CH testimony will be inadmissible hearsay unless a first hand account corroborate it. We are already seeing public details in attempt to undermine her testimony.
Yet, as shocking as this testimony was, I still be believe there is more to come. But that will likely only come once an arrest warrants is executed.
If you're saying she's a shill, I don't believe it. I think the answer is her change of lawyers. Did you notice that the portions that were hearsay could be backed up by calling the originator (Angle, in the case of the limo scene.) The other guy was a Trump favorite who was appointed to the job, not a true SS guy and the executive director of communications who's now a CNN reporter said tonight nothing he said could be believed, unless he were under oath. The counter-attacks on her, I would note, are also not under oath. Tucker Carlson devoted the evening to UFOs. There will be more to come, particularly after her testimony...
"The mills of the gods grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly small." Sextus EmpiricusBetween Eastman and and the other Trump lawyer having had their phones seized and now the emergency surprise hearing, complete with the mention of ongoing witness tampering…it would not surprise me to see Garland finally drop the hammer.
I do believe that this may be the defining issue of the Biden Presidency. I remain doubtful in that I have not heard that Garland had convened a Federal Grand Jury. I do struggle with the fact that a number of Trump appointees remain is place inside the bureaucracy.Between Eastman and and the other Trump lawyer having had their phones seized and now the emergency surprise hearing, complete with the mention of ongoing witness tampering…it would not surprise me to see Garland finally drop the hammer.
Alyssa Griffin, now with CNN said last night that she would not believe anything Ornato said unless he was under oath. She said she had told things she personally knew to be true to the committee which he had contradicted, but not under oath...A January 6 Secret Service Scandal Is Brewing
Evidence of a seditious conspiracy involving officials who remain in the Secret Service is growing as the Secret Service's role in the insurrection comes under new scrutiny.sethabramson.substack.com
This was written in March ‘21
Plenty more on Oranato
That detail leader, Anthony Ornato, was, per the Post, “hired as White House deputy chief of staff [in 2020]. In that role, he helped coordinate a controversial June photo opportunity in which Trump strode defiantly across Lafayette Square to pose with a Bible after the park was forcibly cleared of peaceful protesters.”
Yanking the tablecloth at the dinner table sounds like a real life parody of the cartoons I used to see as a child on tv on Saturday mornings.
Having an average tantrum, he throws plates full of food. But when he’s in full outrage he jerks the tablecloth.
Imagine if he is ever held to account and somehow all the non disclosure agreements he has had people sign were invalidated. The stories that would surface.
I'm just not following how she could wreck the credibility of the committee. Did you see the Mulvaney tweet put up by Diogenes below?Well sort of... i think for a lot of people like myself have known from day one the depravity of Trump. I still firmly believe this was an international conspiracy, Trump was compromised and threatened with his financial entanglements. The testimony given today was that of a man acting in grave desperation.
Given all that we have witnessed over the last 6 years, you can now see the orchestra that was playing behind the clown. So yeah, i do think if you are the cmte you have to address the risk of shill wrecking the credibility of your investigation.
Im glad you are more assured than me. I am prayerfully waiting for more evidence and testimony to come out.