Joey Jones (Fox News clown, not the great Alabama receiver): You call him protester. I call him an agitator. He showed up with a cell phone.
CBS stepped up about Rathergate while channels like Fox purposely lie nearly every day. Rather ignored journalistic standards of veryfing your source and paid the price. Fox talking heads do that nearly every day. Bush did get preferential treatment to get into the reserves. Many others similarly did the same back then also. It was common practice for those who had the power and position. Rather knew it but the 'proof' he offered was false.
To this day, I maintain that Robocop was one of the most underappreciated films of its day. The satire was biting and on-point, but far too many people missed it as they wrote the film off as sci-fi schlock.Yes, Fox is almost like a caricature of the 80s news anchors in movies like "Airplane II" and "Robocop."
I cant see the issue here. He was in power over 10 years. Situations change.This is one of the most extraordinary and illuminating passages in all journalism.
CNN frames Maduro as a paranoid liar for claiming the CIA is trying to overthrow him.
Yet in the very next sentence, it casually notes that the CIA did, in fact, overthrow him.
The level of cognitive dissonance and imperial brain rot you must have to write this, and then have it read by an editor and published, is truly breathtaking.

people experiencing frenchness would also be acceptable /sMy daughter sent this to me. It is, it seems, real.
The Associated Press tweeted this and soon after corrected itself:
View attachment 55409
Because the internet is funny, the responses were hilarious.
“The writer Sarah Haider joked that there was "nothing as dehumanizing as being considered one of the French" and that a better term was "suffering from Frenchness"
Ian Bremmer, a political scientist, suggested "people experiencing Frenchness" as an alternative.
This is one of the most extraordinary and illuminating passages in all journalism.
CNN frames Maduro as a paranoid liar for claiming the CIA is trying to overthrow him.
Yet in the very next sentence, it casually notes that the CIA did, in fact, overthrow him.
The level of cognitive dissonance and imperial brain rot you must have to write this, and then have it read by an editor and published, is truly breathtaking.