Epstein Files -- Be Careful What You Demand

[CrimsonJazz]

BREAKING: Mossad sues DOJ for 'just giving away' the blackmail material that Epstein had worked so hard to generate for them • Genesius Times

In a stunning legal reversal that has left international relations scholars reaching for their strongest...

genesiustimes.com

Mossad’s lead counsel, speaking on condition of deep background and plausible deniability, emphasized that the agency is not contesting the underlying criminality of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. “We merely assert intellectual property rights over the blackmail library we helped assemble,” the attorney explained. “Think of it as a licensing dispute. The DOJ has essentially pirated our entire premium content catalog and put it on the open web for free. Where is the revenue stream? Where is the leverage?”

 

[CrimsonNagus]

Mossad wants to make money off of the Epstein evidence? Must be some powerful, wealthy folks in the UK who are extremely nervous, so they are calling in some favors.

 

[CrimsonJazz]

Mossad wants to make money off of the Epstein evidence? Must be some powerful, wealthy folks in the UK who are extremely nervous, so they are calling in some favors.

Genius Times is a satire site. They are poking fun at the people who believe that Epstein Island was a MOSSAD honeypot operation. And for the record, I haven't dismissed the notion, but I am capable of poking fun at myself.

 

[Bazza]

I don't know how anyone could disagree this Epstein situation has become more of a political football now than anything about the victims. Shocking - I know!

Meanwhile, law enforcement is and has been busy with investigations and arrests - maybe far more in volume than with the Epstein deal.

I wonder if this recent enforcement event makes the legacy news cycle - at all?

A week-long statewide crackdown on human trafficking resulted in more than 600 arrests and the rescue of 170 people, including children as young as 13.

 

[CrimsonNagus]

Then create a thread for that. This is an Esptein thread, and you want to wash it all away. This is the whole problem: the wealthy elite get away with everything, and part of this country seems not to care. Anything to continue supporting Trump, right?

 

[tusks_n_raider]

Then create a thread for that. This is an Esptein thread, and you want to wash it all away. This is the whole problem: the wealthy elite get away with everything, and part of this country seems not to care. Anything to continue supporting Trump, right?

On Topic:

Someone just figured out that the Epstein Files .pdfs have the word “Don’t” redacted by the DOJ

Don’t
Don t

Don T

Aren’t only victims names supposed to be redacted?

I guess this was an attempt to sneakily lower the number of hits for Trump.

 

[crimsonaudio]

This is bleak. From the Epstein Files. February 3, 2014. The day after the Super Bowl. Jes Staley, CEO of Barclays, one of the largest banks in the world, emails Jeffrey Epstein: "you want to know why we are not São Paulo, watch the TV adds on the Super Bowl. Its all about hip blacks in hip cars with white women. The group that should be in the streets, has been bought off. by Jay Z" In 2013, millions of Brazilians took to the streets against corruption and inequality. Staley is telling Epstein: that won't happen here. Americans are too distracted. Pop culture has done its job. A banking CEO, writing to a child sex trafficker, explaining why neither of them will ever face consequences. They think you're bought, they think you're asleep, they think the commercials worked. Were they right?

https://twitter.com/x/status/2019585466262315462

 

[crimsonaudio]

 

[CrimsonJazz]

View attachment 55506

I can't help but notice this, too. The WTH factor has been ramped to 11 with this latest release, this being one reason why. Who knows, maybe billionaires really are just lucky idiots (but I doubt it.)

 

[JDCrimson]

This is bleak. From the Epstein Files. February 3, 2014. The day after the Super Bowl. Jes Staley, CEO of Barclays, one of the largest banks in the world, emails Jeffrey Epstein: "you want to know why we are not São Paulo, watch the TV adds on the Super Bowl. Its all about hip blacks in hip cars with white women. The group that should be in the streets, has been bought off. by Jay Z" In 2013, millions of Brazilians took to the streets against corruption and inequality. Staley is telling Epstein: that won't happen here. Americans are too distracted. Pop culture has done its job. A banking CEO, writing to a child sex trafficker, explaining why neither of them will ever face consequences. They think you're bought, they think you're asleep, they think the commercials worked. Were they right?

View attachment 55504

https://twitter.com/x/status/2019585466262315462

Unfortunately, he is right.

 

[Bazza]

 

[Huckleberry]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2019878052512068055

Bill Clinton:

I have called for the full release of the Epstein files. I have provided a sworn statement of what I know. And just this week, I’ve agreed to appear in person before the committee. But it’s still not enough for Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.

Now, Chairman Comer says he wants cameras, but only behind closed doors. Who benefits from this arrangement? It’s not Epstein’s victims, who deserve justice. Not the public, who deserve the truth. It serves only partisan interests. This is not fact-finding, it’s pure politics.

I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court by a Republican Party running scared. If they want answers, let’s stop the games & do this the right way: in a public hearing, where the American people can see for themselves what this is really about.

 

[CrimsonJazz]

He’s got balls, I’ve give him that. Seems like a reasonable request.

 

[selmaborntidefan]

There is a delicious irony in the fact that the
“but her emails” crowd NOW insists emails are not evidence of anything.

 

[DzynKingRTR]

There is a delicious irony in the fact that the
“but her emails” crowd NOW insists emails are not evidence of anything.

I mean the crowd that thought emails didn't matter then now think emails matter. It is funny how that works out.

 

[Bamaro]

I mean the crowd that thought emails didn't matter then now think emails matter. It is funny how that works out.

The emails wern't really comparable. Clinton didn't want to expose personal/political emails where she was speaking candidly about other politicians. She made the mistake of using her personal email for that. The Epstein emails are about an illegal ring of pedophiles.

 

[92tide]

The emails wern't really comparable. Clinton didn't want to expose personal/political emails where she was speaking candidly about other politicians. She made the mistake of using her personal email for that. The Epstein emails are about an illegal ring of pedophiles.

at least hillary's emails had some risotto recipes

 

[92tide]

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/06/epstein-europe-america-fallout-00769506

The Epstein scandal is taking down Europe’s political class. In the US, they’re getting a pass.​

As Europe moves to address its shame, it’s highlighting the comparative lack of accountability in the U.S.

 

[92tide]

the puke funnel is doing is best to try to hand wave away the epstein files by bringing out the big guns. will they be successful?

 

[selmaborntidefan]

I mean the crowd that thought emails didn't matter then now think emails matter. It is funny how that works out.

Well, yes and no.

In the woodenly literal sense, yes.

Hillary set hers up - and Parnes and Allen wrote a whole book on this - because she blamed her staff for her loss to Obama in 2008 and wanted to spy on them and know who was talking to whom and to protect it from government subpoena. That she was being sneaky, Nixonesque in paranoia, and sent a few classified emails (and then pretended to be dumb about it) is true.

She was not consorting with a well-known pedophile or violating a law passed by a bipartisan Congress in the process. She had not spent months dangling the “look what I’ve got and I’m gonna pull the trigger” taunt and then failed to deliver after Congress said she must.

Trump now has his stones in a sling over something he could have never mentioned.

I think “she lost because emails” is another in the long line of loser excuse myths in US political history, ranking alongside Daley cooking the books in 1960, Reagan concocting a secret deal with Iran in 1980, Perot costing Bush in 1992, and any list of excuses from either side in 2000.

But let us assume it is true.

I’m OK with living in a world where emails cost her the presidency and one where emails cost Trump the presidency. Plus, rarely are emails actual evidence but instead .2 questions that can be asked to ascertain facts and evidence.