Link: NCAA Proposes Penalties in Attempt to Prevent Student Athletes From Transferring Outside the Portal Window.

CB4

Hall of Fame
Aug 8, 2011
12,526
21,008
187
Birmingham, AL
The NCAA has put forth a proposal to penalize member institutions significantly if they accept a student athlete that unenrolls at one school then enrolls at another and is added to their roster. This is an attempt to prevent what may predict will be post spring practice “unenrolling” by some to seek better roster positions/NIL deals for the upcoming season.

My questions though are “How quickly will this get challenged in the courts and does the NCAA have the ability to actually enforce it?”

 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg
The NCAA has put forth a proposal to penalize member institutions significantly if they accept a student athlete that unenrolls at one school then enrolls at another and is added to their roster. This is an attempt to prevent what may predict will be post spring practice “unenrolling” by some to seek better roster positions/NIL deals for the upcoming season.

My questions though are “How quickly will this get challenged in the courts and does the NCAA have the ability to actually enforce it?”

Yeah, I honestly don't see that one holding up in a court of law... :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg
If the courts keep ruling against everything the NCAA does, then it doesn't matter if it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body. Teams and players can basically do what they want. What difference does it make whether it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body, if all the players/schools have to do is sue and ultimately always win?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CB4 and NoNC4Tubs
If the courts keep ruling against everything the NCAA does, then it doesn't matter if it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body. Teams and players can basically do what they want. What difference does it make whether it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body, if all the players/schools have to do is sue and ultimately always win?
This is an attempt to make the tail wag the dog by the NCAA. They know they can’t control the players. They hope to restrict the player options by penalizing the schools. They know if do anything to restrict the players will be seen as restraint of competition/opportunity in terms of NIL.

Short of an anti-trust exemption, the NCAA or any governing body will be handcuffed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bamabuzzard
This is an attempt to make the tail wag the dog by the NCAA. They know they can’t control the players. They hope to restrict the player options by penalizing the schools. They know if do anything to restrict the players will be seen as restraint of competition/opportunity in terms of NIL.

Short of an anti-trust exemption, the NCAA or any governing body will be handcuffed.
This is the conclusion I've come to as well. There's literally hardly anything that can be done to restrict what player and school can do.
 
This is an attempt to make the tail wag the dog by the NCAA. They know they can’t control the players. They hope to restrict the player options by penalizing the schools. They know if do anything to restrict the players will be seen as restraint of competition/opportunity in terms of NIL.

Short of an anti-trust exemption, the NCAA or any governing body will be handcuffed.

This is the conclusion I've come to as well. There's literally hardly anything that can be done to restrict what player and school can do.

I like the proposed rule. I agree with you guys that it probably can't be enforced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CB4
The courts will always rule against the NCAA, they have a curse on them for obvious reasons. The only way to save college football is for the schools to act in unison and simply threaten to stop football until such time as everyone agrees to a governing process. The courts can't "make" them field a football team. it has always been their choice. I believe with facing the end of the money train the players will agree to submit to a managed situation. That will work until the players form a union. Then college football will bankrupt and the NFL will just start a farm league and pull from high school. At this point I really don't care.
 
The courts will always rule against the NCAA, they have a curse on them for obvious reasons. The only way to save college football is for the schools to act in unison and simply threaten to stop football until such time as everyone agrees to a governing process. The courts can't "make" them field a football team. it has always been their choice. I believe with facing the end of the money train the players will agree to submit to a managed situation. That will work until the players form a union. Then college football will bankrupt and the NFL will just start a farm league and pull from high school. At this point I really don't care.
It’s not just college football. It’s all major college sports. College basketball is worse. Just doesn’t get reported as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rolltide7854
If the courts keep ruling against everything the NCAA does, then it doesn't matter if it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body. Teams and players can basically do what they want. What difference does it make whether it is the NCAA or a newly established governing body, if all the players/schools have to do is sue and ultimately always win?
It's a good idea if they can make it stick. They punish the school for accepting the player, instead of the player himself. We know if they punish the player, he will automatically run to a lawyer. But if they say to the schools, sure you can take him, but if he plays, here's your penalties. I doubt they can, but I hope they could make it stick. There has to be some kind of rules!
 
The NCAA cannot enforce the rules it has now. I do not see this one happening but I do agree something needs to be done. Congress should come up with something but they cannot even agree to keep the government open.
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads