"Muschamp would take Bama's spot in SEC title game" - Page 6
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 66 to 68 of 68
  1. #66
    BamaNation Hall of Fame bamaga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    next to Boo Radley's house

    Re: "Muschamp would take Bama's spot in SEC title game"

    Quote Originally Posted by irNate View Post
    I think that means that if the rankings looked like this:

    1. Alabama
    2. Florida
    3. LSU
    4. T&M
    5. UGA
    6. Arkansas
    7. Miss St
    8. Ole Miss
    9. Tenesee
    10. Oregon

    Then only the SEC Champ would make it into the play off so you'd have #1 vs #10-13 more than likely

    at least thats my take on it ( and yes I did it like that to prove a point)
    I think only 2 of those teams get in. that is why a 4 team playoff will not work. this is off topic,BTW
    to 16 and beyond........

  2. Advertisement
  3. #67
    REC | FB | BB Moderator RTR91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Re: "Muschamp would take Bama's spot in SEC title game"

    The more I look at the articles from the last month, I realize I had the playoff format wrong. I was thinking about the bowl selection, not the team selection.
    "I don't know what class is but I can tell when one has it, you can tell from a mile away"
    -- Coach Bryant

    "We always talk about playing 60 minutes but this is a 60-10 game: the 60 minutes of the game and the 10 minutes in the locker room after the game that you remember for the rest of your life."
    -- Nick Saban day after beating Clemson

  4. #68
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Bazza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    New Smyrna Beach, Florida

    Re: "Muschamp would take Bama's spot in SEC title game"

    Quote Originally Posted by crimsonaudio View Post
    No, suggesting that you would get the nod over, say, Boise State with their perennial cupcake scheduling. A one-loss SEC team should always get the nod over a undefeated cupcake team.
    Thanks - I misunderstood your comment, Audio...sorry my mistake!

    Strength of schedule should always be included as determining criteria along with W-L records.

    Along those same lines...it always bugs me when player (or team) stats are given without consideration of strength of schedule. An ACC QB's stats are not on par with those of an SEC QB, for example. It almost seems like an * should be put next to stats coming from a conference other than the SEC. I hope that doesn't sound too biased!



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


TideFansStore.com: Get YOUR gear!