A BCSCG statistical snippet: Why Notre Dame's Rushing Defense ranking is misleading.. - Page 6
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 66 to 68 of 68
  1. #66
    BamaNation Hall of Fame uafan4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Florence, AL
    Thread Starter

    Re: A BCSCG statistical snippet: Why Notre Dame's Rushing Defense ranking is misleadi

    Quote Originally Posted by MBA_99 View Post
    I'd like to see an analysis involving the first team offenses and defenses. I have only watched ND vs Pitt and USC. They sure as heck kept starters in all day. Against Michigan we emptied the bench a good bit; did they? I seriously doubt it. Auburn's first string would've had like -50 rushing yards against our first string D if they weren't back at Bryant Hall shortly after halftime. In all but 3 games I cant recall a second half where Eli wasn't talking like it was late on A-Day.
    That's not a bad idea but difficult to do, especially on a large scale. I prefer what I call "targeted" stats, e.g. looking at only the top ranked or rated teams, only at teams with similar styles, etc. And, on that note, here's another interesting snippet regarding the scoring offenses and defenses of these two clubs...

    Everyone knows that both Notre Dame and Alabama have two of the highest rated Scoring Defenses in the Country. In fact, they're #1 and #2, respectively. Of course, that ranking is based upon the number of points allowed per game. While that is a very important stat, I place a bit more weight on Plays Per Point or - for easier reading - Plays Per 10 Points. This is the number of plays the defense is forcing their opposing offenses to run in order to score 10 points, on average. Interestingly enough, Notre Dame and Alabama again rank #1 and #2, respectively, in this stat. Alabama is forcing its opposing offensive units to average 56.26 plays to get 10 points while Notre Dame is forcing a very impressive 61.05 plays. The third ranked team in this stat, Florida, is requiring 50.90 plays - and those three teams are the only teams that top 50 plays. In fact, there are only 20 teams in the Country averaging forcing more than 35 plays for their opponents to net 10 points. Of course, that's just raw stats. What about the differentials?

    I have several different categories that I like to break (or split, hence the term "splits") teams and units into for comparisons. One of my favorites is the Top 5 category, especially relating to unit performance. In this case, I took the Top 5 Scoring Defenses (overall - per game) that each offense faced and used those aggregate numbers to form the differentials for those units. Likewise, I also used Top 5 Scoring Offenses, Top 5 Scoring Efficient (Plays Per Point) Offenses & Defenses, Top 5 Total (Total Yards) Offenses & Defenses, Top 5 Efficient (Yards Per Play) Offenses & Defenses, and Top 5 Driving Efficient (Drives Per 10 Points) Offenses & Defenses. I won't overload the post with all of the stats from all of those breakdowns - I'll give a summary in a minute - but here are some of the interesting notes from those first four categories, the Top 5 Scoring / Scoring Efficient Offenses & Defenses...

    Versus the Top 5 Scoring Defenses & Offenses They Played
    Alabama Offense
    Notre Dame Offense Alabama Defense Notre Dame Defense
    31.2 19.8 18.2 9.6
    Opponents' Avg.
    19.9 17.4 35.7 32.8
    Differential 11.3 2.4 -17.5 -23.2
    Plays Per 10 Points
    22 31 34 65
    Opponents' Avg.
    35 38 19 21
    Differential -13 -7 15 44
    TD_Scoring_Percentage 80.0% 50.0% 80.0% 25.0%
    Opponents' Avg.
    69.7% 59.9% 81.9% 77.5%
    Differential 10.3% -9.9% -1.9% -52.5%

    As you can see, Alabama's Offense performed significantly better than Notre Dame's Offense when facing each of their 5 toughest opponents to score against. Conversely, Notre Dame's Defense performed noticeably better than Alabama's Defense did when facing each of their 5 toughest opponents to keep from scoring. One thing you'll notice is that Bama's Offense far out-shined Notre Dame's Offense when facing the best teams they faced. Granted, the Defenses Notre Dame faced were allowing slightly fewer points per game and requiring slightly more plays per 10 points than the ones Bama faced but that difference is much, much smaller than the difference in the performance between those two units. Something you won't notice - since it isn't there, mostly because it won't fit - is that the combined Scoring Defense differential ratings for the Defenses that Alabama faced in this grouping is noticeably better than for the ones the Notre Dame faced.

    A third thing you'll notice is that Notre Dame's Defense performed much better than Alabama's defense. What you may not notice, though, is that their numbers are a little erratic. For one, the best offense they faced was USC at the end of the year which had several key injuries including along the Offensive Line and at Quarterback, starting a Freshman backup getting his first start against the #1 team in the country. The really weird thing, though, is that the three worst games, from a points allowed standpoint, were against teams not in their Top 5 Scoring Offenses category. That can mean - or be due to - several things. As alluded to before, it could have a fair bit to do with luck, e.g. catching teams without their best offensive weapons. It could mean that Notre Dame is very "streaky" on Defense, i.e. when they're on they're very on and when they're not on they're more average. It could also mean that their Defense has a knack for "coming to play" against the better offenses while slacking off a bit in other games.

    The biggest factor that you don't see in that little chart, though, is all about the match-ups. Neither offense has faced a defense ranked as highly as the other team's defense - because there aren't any. Both teams have faced 5 defenses ranked in the Top 30 in what I call the Total Scoring Defense Rating - a combination of the points per game, plays per 10 points, drives per 10 points, and TD percentage raw stats and differentials. Against those teams, Alabama's Offense measured up much better than Notre Dame's Offense. The Defenses, though, present an interesting twist. Alabama's Defense has faced 5 Offenses ranked in the Top 35 in the Total Scoring Offense Rating, with two of those in the Top 10. Notre Dame's Defense has only faced 2 Offenses ranked in the Top 35 in the Total Scoring Offense Rating and none in the Top 20. Notre Dame has, though, faced 7 Offenses in the Top 60 - the same number as Alabama. This category becomes very interesting, though, when you look at where each team's offense ranks.

    Notre Dame's offense currently comes in at 82nd in the Country. While Notre Dame's offense ranks a very respectable 32nd in driving efficiency, they are 73rd in plays per 10 points, 75th in points per game, 84th in scoring differentials, and 119th in TD percentage. That ranking means that Alabama's Defense has faced 8 offenses that are more difficult to prevent from scoring than Notre Dame's Offense.

    The number of offenses that Notre Dame's Defense has faced that are ranked higher than the Crimson Tide's Offense?



    Because, which will be a surprise to some, the strength of this year's Crimson Tide team is actually the Offense, not the Defense.

    The Crimson Tide Offense comes in at #2 in the Total Scoring Offense Rating, trailing only Oregon. While Alabama is only 15th in the Country in Points Per Game and 37th in TD percentage, the Crimson Tide is 3rd in Plays per 10 points, 2nd in driving efficiency, and 1st in scoring differentials.

    So, when you look at the raw stats and rankings for the Scoring Offenses and Defenses of Alabama and Notre Dame, there are four aspects to consider when weighing those numbers:
    1) Alabama's Offense hasn't faced any Defenses better than Notre Dame's but has faced 4 Defenses in the same "zip code", i.e. within 25 spots, and has performed exceptionally well against those teams.
    2) Notre Dame's Offense hasn't faced any Defenses better than Alabama's but has also faced 4 Defenses in the same "zip code", i.e. within 25 spots, and has performed exceptionally well against those teams.
    3) Alabama's Defense has faced 8 Offenses that are better than Notre Dame's and has performed very well against those teams.
    4) Notre Dame's Defense has faced 0, yes Zero, Offenses better than Alabama's and only faced 1 Defense in the same "zip code" and, while they performed very well against that Offense, that Offense was missing their starting Quarterback.

    And, just for kicks, if you combine all of the Total Scoring Offense & Defense ratings and differentials and apply them to the Alabama - Notre Dame unit match-ups, the numbers add up to a predicted score of:

    Alabama 24
    Notre Dame 10
    I have yet to figure out why common sense and common courtesy are called common.
    - Unknown

    Tradition is always under construction.
    - Nick Saban

  2. Advertisement
  3. #67
    BamaNation First Team crmsntd91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010

    Re: A BCSCG statistical snippet: Why Notre Dame's Rushing Defense ranking is misleadi

    Well I guess the only thing I can follow that post up with without looking dumb is ROLL TIDE ROLL!!!
    "We have an opponent in this state that we work every day, 365 days a year, to dominate."

  4. #68
    BamaNation Hall of Fame selmaborntidefan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Dallas, TX

    Re: A BCSCG statistical snippet: Why Notre Dame's Rushing Defense ranking is misleadi

    Quote Originally Posted by FriendlyIrish View Post
    From an ND fan who has watched every snap this season, I think that is a pretty good assessment. To #2, that is kind of what we try and do. We like to (except early in the game) have long drives over 5 minutes and move the chains. Control possession. That will be much more difficult against your D I believe, unless Golson continues to keep plays alive with his feet.
    I'm going to watch your other games that are on You Tube. I found several last night. Stanford next. I don't think it's fair to judge ND by Pitt any more than it is to judge Bama by aTm. In both cases they were follow-ons to emotional wins.

    The one thing that surprised me was that the score was a tad misleading. Notre Dame unqeustionably beat OU and deserved to win, but the 30-13 final score was a tad misleading. That's not to take away from a great win in Norman - but the turning point was that bizarre interception by Teo.

    One other point: OU was -3 in turnovers this year - they turn the ball over a LOT. Notre Dame was +9. That was a tiny bit misleading because Michigan turned it over six times. Still, Notre Dame got more than they gave up, which is why they're here.We're at +12, and even if you take away the game where Arkansas had five we're still at +7. (Note also we lost a turnover in that game when an interception return for a TD was wrongly ruled to have hit the ground).

    Furthermore - MOST of our turnovers (we had 16 in 13 games) were irrelevant. Lacy's fumble against Michigan was on the last play of the half and meant nothing. We had two immediately after the lightning storm in Missouri halted the game that didn't bring any real harm. And the fumble in the Auburn game (that I attended) was in their red zone when we were up 49-0 by the backups. You'd have to tell me which incidental turnovers the Irish had.

    Bottom line: whoever wins turnover battle wins.
    The first rule of Tidefans interactions - Selma does not use Google; Google uses Selma



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


TideFansStore.com: Get YOUR gear!