Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever" - Page 4
Page 4 of 86 FirstFirst 12345678910111454 ... LastLast
Results 40 to 52 of 1112
  1. #40
    BamaNation Hall of Fame AUDub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    I don't roll on Shabbos.
    Posts
    9,509

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by cbi1972 View Post
    Have a like for the reference.
    Just a barner.
    Off the Gus Bus and on the Pearl Parade!

  2. Advertisement
  3. #41
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
    Posts
    19,832

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by AUDub View Post
    This post reminds me of this:
    The comic strip could easily be reworked:

    Alarmist: The temperature is rising. We must do something!
    Skeptic: Well, weather is either heating or cooling over time. It's not static.

    Alarmist: We need a government program!
    Skeptic: The government doesn't do much of anything well except waste money, distort markets, and bring about unintended consequences.

    Alarmist: We must do something!
    Skeptic: Like what? Every man, woman, and child in this country could reduce their carbon footprint to zero and it wouldn't make a difference.

    Alarmist: You're a science denier!
    Skeptic: You avoid talking about solutions. Corn ethanol was going to fix everything. Then giving money to firms like Solyndra. Seems like your solutions are nothing but scams. Talk to me when the government undoes all the fraud they've already heaped on the taxpayer.
    Bodhi


    Lily (age 6): Daddy, I know what I want to be when I grow up: an artist.
    Bodhi (internally groaning): Yeah? What kind of artist?
    Lily: A balloon animal artist!
    Bodhi (face palm)

  4. #42
    BamaNation Hall of Fame AUDub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    I don't roll on Shabbos.
    Posts
    9,509

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    Alarmist: The temperature is rising. We must do something!
    Skeptic: Well, weather is either heating or cooling over time. It's not static.
    Nobody here said it was. That's also a very deceptive misrepresentation.

    Oh, and weather and climate are not the same thing.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    Alarmist: We need a government program!
    Skeptic: The government doesn't do much of anything well except waste money, distort markets, and bring about unintended consequences.
    The government is capable of doing good things through regulation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    Alarmist: We must do something!
    Skeptic: Like what? Every man, woman, and child in this country could reduce their carbon footprint to zero and it wouldn't make a difference.
    And you base this assertion on what? That's a pretty much unobtainable goal, anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    Alarmist: You're a science denier!
    Skeptic: You avoid talking about solutions. Corn ethanol was going to fix everything. Then giving money to firms like Solyndra. Seems like your solutions are nothing but scams. Talk to me when the government undoes all the fraud they've already heaped on the taxpayer.
    My solutions? Refer to post 34.
    Just a barner.
    Off the Gus Bus and on the Pearl Parade!

  5. #43
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
    Posts
    19,832

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by AUDub View Post
    Nobody here said it was.
    People like Al Gore have.


    The government is capable of doing good things through regulation.
    I stand by my statement that most of what the government does is fail. I see it first hand every day.

    And you base this assertion on what? That's a pretty much unobtainable goal, anyway.
    My assertion is that we have people who want to tax and regulate our economy into oblivion while conveniently ignoring the fact that countries like China and India are not going to sacrifice their economies chasing environmental unicorns.

    My solutions? Refer to post 34.
    What alternative energies do you think will work? So far what the government has put forth has been fraudulent.
    Bodhi


    Lily (age 6): Daddy, I know what I want to be when I grow up: an artist.
    Bodhi (internally groaning): Yeah? What kind of artist?
    Lily: A balloon animal artist!
    Bodhi (face palm)

  6. #44
    BamaNation Hall of Fame AUDub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    I don't roll on Shabbos.
    Posts
    9,509

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    People like Al Gore have.
    I have never heard Al Gore say the climate is static. Do you have a link?

    Even if he did, he's wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    I stand by my statement that most of what the government does is fail. I see it first hand every day.
    And I stand by my statement that the government is very capable of bringing about positive change through regulation. They've done it before.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    My assertion is that we have people who want to tax and regulate our economy into oblivion while conveniently ignoring the fact that countries like China and India are not going to sacrifice their economies chasing environmental unicorns.
    Just because China and India lag behind us is no reason not to make an effort to get our own house in order. Or, to put it simply, two wrongs don't make a right. And who said we needed to tax and regulate our economy into oblivion to get measurable results?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    What alternative energies do you think will work? So far what the government has put forth has been fraudulent.
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the corn ethanol was driven more by the farm lobby than by environmentalists. There was a claim that it was carbon neutral, that was before considering the energy required to farm and harvest the corn. Solyndra was a noble, but silly, investment.

    Speaking for myself, I don't believe there are any convenient solutions available at this time. In post 34, I brought up Lockheed-Martin's supposed fusion breakthrough. That would be an incredible game changer, and our best bet to transition to cheap, clean energy without drastically altering our way of life.
    Last edited by AUDub; February 9th, 2015 at 04:59 PM.
    Just a barner.
    Off the Gus Bus and on the Pearl Parade!

  7. #45
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
    Posts
    19,832

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by AUDub View Post
    I have never heard Al Gore say the climate is static. Do you have a link?

    Even if he did, he's wrong.
    The whole debate centers on climate "change", as if anything other than the status quo is bad and must have a government solution. I find it amusing that change is supposed to be all bad or even predominately bad.

    And I stand by my statement that the government is very capable of bringing about positive change through regulation. They've done it before.
    The government doing something right is the blind squirrel and whatnot.

    Just because China and India lag behind us is no reason not to make an effort to get our own house in order. Or, to put it simply, two wrongs don't make a right. And who said we needed to tax and regulate our economy into oblivion to get measurable results?
    I don't accept that surrendering more wealth and freedoms to government bureaucracy is "getting our own house in order" or correcting a "wrong." I've only heard of billions (trillions?) in wealth transfers from productive Americans to the politically connnected and from First World countries to developing countries under the banner of combating climate change.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the corn ethanol was driven more by the farm lobby than by environmentalists. There was a claim that it was carbon neutral, that was before considering the energy required to farm and harvest the corn. Solyndra was a noble, but silly, investment as well.

    Speaking for myself, I don't believe there are any convenient solutions available at this time. In post 34, I brought up Lockheed-Martin's supposed fusion breakthrough. That would be an incredible game changer, and our best bet to transition to cheap, clean energy without drastically altering our way of life.
    I remember seeing a program on 60 Minutes (or something similar) that championed corn ethanol. There were plenty of environmental groups championing it at the time. It has since been shown to be a huge net negative for the envrionment and for the pocket book of Americans. Yet it persists. Bad government policies are almost never rolled back.

    Solyndra was foolish from the jump. If a plan requires government support because the private sector won't invest, what does that tell you?

    I'm for any private sector innovation. If LM has a winning technology that would be great. How many other great ideas are delayed or stangled in infancy because the government siphons off wealth to crowd the market with fraudulent solutions?
    Bodhi


    Lily (age 6): Daddy, I know what I want to be when I grow up: an artist.
    Bodhi (internally groaning): Yeah? What kind of artist?
    Lily: A balloon animal artist!
    Bodhi (face palm)

  8. #46
    BamaNation All-American PacadermaTideUs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Navarre, FL
    Posts
    3,919

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by AUDub View Post
    Speaking for myself, I don't believe there are any convenient solutions available at this time. In post 34, I brought up Lockheed-Martin's supposed fusion breakthrough. That would be an incredible game changer, and our best bet to transition to cheap, clean energy without drastically altering our way of life.
    Plasma Waste Gasification: a technology that is not yet common knowledge, but is currently in use in several worldwide locations, including several US Military Installations. High startup costs compared to a landfill, but very cost/environment friendly in the long-haul.

  9. #47
    BamaNation Hall of Fame AUDub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    I don't roll on Shabbos.
    Posts
    9,509

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    The whole debate centers on climate "change", as if anything other than the status quo is bad and must have a government solution. I find it amusing that change is supposed to be all bad or even predominately bad.
    The context in which the statement is used is important. This is how it is referenced in all of the scientific literature on the subject.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    The government doing something right is the blind squirrel and whatnot.
    My contention is that legislation to reduce our emissions would be doing something right. Much like preventing manufacturers from dumping poison into our waterways, or phasing out CFCs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    I don't accept that surrendering more wealth and freedoms to government bureaucracy is "getting our own house in order" or correcting a "wrong." I've only heard of billions (trillions?) in wealth transfers from productive Americans to the politically connnected and from First World countries to developing countries under the banner of combating climate change.
    Surrendering our "freedoms" is sometimes necessary. Again, I use the example of poisoning our waterways or phasing out CFCs. Maybe even preventing predatory lending practices from the banks, for another example.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    I remember seeing a program on 60 Minutes (or something similar) that championed corn ethanol. There were plenty of environmental groups championing it at the time. It has since been shown to be a huge net negative for the envrionment and for the pocket book of Americans. Yet it persists. Bad government policies are almost never rolled back.
    The status-quo on corn ethanol is maintained in the best interests of powerful lobbies in corn growing states and ethanol producers. I need to go look up the position statements of various environmental groups at the time the subsidies were passed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    Solyndra was foolish from the jump. If a plan requires government support because the private sector won't invest, what does that tell you?
    Do not disagree.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    I'm for any private sector innovation. If LM has a winning technology that would be great. How many other great ideas are delayed or stangled in infancy because the government siphons off wealth to crowd the market with fraudulent solutions?
    How many, indeed. I do not believe Lockeed-Martin is hurting in the R&D area though.

    I'll have a beer and refine this reply. Just got home. Long day at the office.
    Last edited by AUDub; February 9th, 2015 at 08:11 PM.
    Just a barner.
    Off the Gus Bus and on the Pearl Parade!

  10. #48
    BamaNation Hall of Fame cuda.1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Allen, Texas
    Posts
    7,603

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    I'm constantly amazed that supposedly-educated people believe this hoax.

    The same chuckleheads who are promoting this crap are the same ones who were screaming, at the top of their lungs, about the coming Ice Age.

    At the first so-called "Earth Day". (I was there; don't tell me otherwise.)

    We can't predict tomorrow's weather, but we can use the same models to predict what will happen 100 years in the future. Right................

    And when the same models, run in reverse, don't return to the proper initial conditions, the people who really understand science are smart enough to know the model is defective. (Some of us like to call such actions a "sanity test". I do lots of sanity tests, on the work I do. Otherwise, I don't believe it. Not about to throw good money at something that has no chance of working. Won't stay in bidnis long, if I do.)

    (Wait.........researchers just say "more investigation is needed" when their funding runs out. Don't tell me otherwise. Been there, done that.)

    Even if this crap was 1% true, what can be done about it?

    Pretty much nothing. Do the math; it doesn't pan out. But it doesn't stop the statists from using this hoax to ruin our lives, and enrich their cronies. Both of which are also crap.

    But, yes, let's get away from fossil fuels. Just switch to natural gas! So says Notzy Pelozi.

    Go ahead and hang your hat on the likes of nincompoops like her. Really strengthens your already bogus argument.
    "I hate morning people.
    And mornings.

    And people!"

  11. #49
    BamaNation All-American
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,042

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by ValuJet View Post
    Al Gore recently said $90 Trillion should help eliminate greenhouse gases and cars. Does the planet even have $90 Trillion?
    As for the scientific community as it relates to Climate Change, they are the government. So to continue their funding, of course they're going to perpetuate the fraud.
    Call the FED, we could have 90 trillion tomorrow.
    Last edited by BamaPokerplayer; February 18th, 2015 at 09:56 PM.

  12. #50
    BamaNation All-American PacadermaTideUs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Navarre, FL
    Posts
    3,919

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Quote Originally Posted by BamaPokerplayer View Post
    Call the FED, we could have 90 trillion tomorrow.
    That's absolutely true. And the simple act of printing the money might actually take care of cars without ever spending a dime of it on green initiatives. Only the super-wealthy could afford to own one. The rest of us would be hoofing it down to the quicky mart for a $200 loaf of bread.

  13. #51
    BamaNation All-American
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,042

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    If the government steps in to help with global warming it is going to be like Prohibition; doing a lot more damage than would have happened had the government stayed out of it.

  14. #52
    BamaNation All-SEC bamahippie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cullman, AL
    Posts
    1,971

    Re: Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

    Science "facts", when presented by, for, or because of the gubmint, is an oxymoron.

    There is always an agenda. Always.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

[CLICK] GET BAMA Calendar