http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesta...cientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-crisis/
I'm sure these have been discredited as well, though. But yeah, every scientist in the world agrees that the end is near. The war with the fundies on why is just around the corner.
There have been a number of very prominent scientists, including atmospheric scientist, climate scientists, and others who disagree with the "consensus". A "consensus" means little to me anyway. It doesn't prove anything. Scientists arguing against it doesn't prove anything.
The reason I linked the petition (and yes, some names have been verified as fake, some had faked credentials, and some real scientists who really signed it have since changed their mind to one degree or another) and the Forbes article was to show that there is legitimate disagreement among scientists. And there is disagreement. And not just on the fringe. The disagreements are usually about the cause and the consequences.
Either way, previous climate models with wild predictions about catastrophic consequences have not quite panned out that way. Previous predictions made in peer-reviewed studies and by the IPCC or similar groups have not come true. By and large, the models can't even predict the past. IOW, they fail when past numbers are fed to them to predict what already did happen in the past. If a model for prediction is to be credible it has to be able to "predict" what we already know has happened. The current models fail miserably at that.
I'd appreciate if you laid off the ad hominem remarks, especially in regards to fambly. If the best you can do is attack the messenger and have no support for your message then - what am I talking about? This is the perfect place for you. Just keep it cordial, please.