Where have we heard this before? The chickens always come home to roost.The state’s biggest fiscal burden is underfunded retiree benefits, which account for up to 24% of general expenditures, according to Moody’s Investors Service
FIFYIllinois exists to warn other states not to implement a lottery.
I like the map showing the fiscal solvency of each state. I guess "progressive" means progressively incompetent.
Alabama's GOP legislators took their sweet time passing a budget and it is a mess as well.Wait a damned minute - they haven't passed a STATE budget?
(Looks up on Internet, sees Illinois has a House that is 71-47 Democrats, a Senate of 59-20 Democrats, and a Republican Governor who has been in office since January......)
So should I conclude they adopted THIS type of tactic from Harry Reid?
And how can you have 'underfunded retiree benefits' in a union state?
Hmmm............
It's obviously due to global warming.....oh, and George BushWait a damned minute - they haven't passed a STATE budget?
(Looks up on Internet, sees Illinois has a House that is 71-47 Democrats, a Senate of 59-20 Democrats, and a Republican Governor who has been in office since January......)
So should I conclude they adopted THIS type of tactic from Harry Reid?
And how can you have 'underfunded retiree benefits' in a union state?
Hmmm............
Don't Progressives have a new name for that: Climate Change.It's obviously due to global warming.....oh, and George Bush
You obviously are not paying attention.Don't Progressives have a new name for that: Climate Change.
I have no problem with this being pointed out, but.....are they giving out IOUs to state lottery winners?Alabama's GOP legislators took their sweet time passing a budget and it is a mess as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FIFYIllinois exists to warn other states how not to run a state.
Correct. They'll get robbed and murdered not having collected anything.Well, the positive spin is that at least the lotto winners won't get robbed and murdered after collecting their winnings.
Puerto Rico is the terrifying Ghost of Illinois Future: a worst-case example of what happens when a government no longer can pay its bills.
The island, an American territory, is weighed down by $123 billion in bond and pension debt it cannot afford. Illinois, meanwhile, has about $130 billion in unfunded pension obligations alone, plus billions more in retiree health care and other liabilities. The circumstances are different, but no government can function properly — indefinitely — under ever-rising debt. Eventually something gives.
Sadly, I think this a very near future for our country in general. I think most states are operating at some sort of deficit, especially if you were to take out all federal funding. Our country itself is $20T in debt, not including all the unfunded mandates that exist. No government can survive with that kind of debt. Greece/Puerto Rico/Venezuela is our future if we don't radically change something and soon.
Three choices with national debt:Sadly, I think this a very near future for our country in general. I think most states are operating at some sort of deficit, especially if you were to take out all federal funding. Our country itself is $20T in debt, not including all the unfunded mandates that exist. No government can survive with that kind of debt. Greece/Puerto Rico/Venezuela is our future if we don't radically change something and soon.
I thought it was Manbearpig.Don't Progressives have a new name for that: Climate Change.
There's a forth option (although not a good one either):Three choices with national debt:
(a) pay it off (in other words, run huge budget surpluses for decades; fat chance with Democrats and Republicans in Washington).
(b) Inflate it away. (The Weimar Republic tried that. It did not work so well. Here is a German woman feeding Reichsmarks into the furnace because they were worth less than coal).
(c) Repudiate the debt. Tell those who bought US debt, "Sorry. We ain't paying the interest on that debt. Heck, we ain't even paying the principal. Suckers." Needless to say, interest rates on loan to the Federal government would skyrocket, if lenders could be found at all. Once a country plays the repudiation card, it must run budget surpluses for decades as lenders are wary of lending money and then having the government repudiate the debt again the next year. How hard would it be for Congress, running budget surpluses when people have unfunded needs?
Repudiate, inflate, or pay the debt. Those are the only options. All are painful. Some more painful than others.