How amazing is it that the discussion about who is the best college coach ever centers on two coaches - both of which coached at Alabama? Man, we have it good!
This is my line of thinking also. It is close right now.As someone who became an Alabama fan back in the days when Coach Bryant was winning championships I must say I'm on the fence right now as to which one is better. I will have to see what Coach Saban does with the remainder of his coaching career before making a judgement.
Boy do we have it good. I have been around for 11 of our NC (was an infant when Coach Bryant won his 1st one). It is amazing we have won a NC every 5 years on average in the past 54 years.How amazing is it that the discussion about who is the best college coach ever centers on two coaches - both of which coached at Alabama? Man, we have it good!
Is there an actual example of this? By that, I mean an example of Bryant taking his 100+ undersized, no talent, team and beating a team of 100+ studs? I refuse to believe that Bryant was getting so out-recruited, that all those teams he coached were of inferior players and talent.It all depends on what you consider a great coach to be.
If it's strictly based on football coaching ability then I would go with Bryant, and here's why....
Coach Saban is awesome, but in order for him to win he has to have championship caliber players.
Therefore recruiting is probably the biggest part of his, "process"
Coach Bryant could take a team far less talented than the team he was facing and completely beat their brains out. I'm not sure if Coach S. can do that.
As a few have said though, they're definitely the best of their eras.
First of all, nice graphic I appreciate that. It is hard to make a call on this one. Two things seem to jump out at me. First, Coach Bryant had 6 NC's in 25 years while Saban has coached his way to 5 in roughly half that time. However, Coach Bryant's winning percentage over the longevity of his career at Bama is amazing. More games means more opportunity to win, but it also more opportunities to lose. To have the success that Coach Bryant had over decades of game evolution, coaching changes, and the adversity that he, at times, faced is absolutely amazing. Like a previous poster, I feel blessed that we can have this conversation comparing two coaches that call the Capstone home. I think that CNS is this generation's Bear Bryant. That I have absolutely no doubt about.
The same perception of the team and the awe of the coach, the same.I wasn't lucky enough to see the Bear coach so this one is hard for me. It is hard to dispute what Saban has done here. I like to think this is what it felt like to be a Bama fan back when the Bear was coaching.
The first game I ever listened to on radio was Bama vs the Barn in 1957. A nightmare 40 to 0! There was a JURDAN coaching that team, I mean Jordan. I think they called him Shug! Who in their right mind would name their child Shug?As someone who became an Alabama fan back in the days when Coach Bryant was winning championships I must say I'm on the fence right now as to which one is better. I will have to see what Coach Saban does with the remainder of his coaching career before making a judgement.
Coach Stallings made a good point that most players came from Alabama, which could easily create a more hit or miss team as far as talent. I bet an overwhelming majority of the extra players were 1 and 2 star caliber athletes. Tweeners. This neutralizes the recruiting angle imo, but we do have #1 and #2 best coaches of all time, whomever you place first. As far as footprint on our program, you cannot take away the number of years Coach Bryant had us in position to win a NC, 2 decades.Some people are pointing out that when the Bear was coaching he had no recruiting limits whereas Saban has to go against a more level playing field. However I'd like to point out that everyone the Bear went against had the same no recruiting limits he had so the field was just as level then as it is now.
The problem that you run into is that bear never beat Royal or ara. I believe the only legendary or elite coach of CNS's time that he didn't beat was Bowden. Plus you have a bigger mixture of possible teams that could potentially win the title and less controversial polling in CNS's years coaching than CPB's. I think there is a misinterpretation that CPB built Alabama, and CNS just awoke Alabama. I hate the 30 for 30 Roll Tide/War Eagle special for many reasons, mainly because it takes a more pro Auburn interpretation of history, but there is one truth to it. It is that Alabama progressed exponentially when the iron bowl hiatus happened and us and Tennessee became the perennial super powers of the south. Sure Shug won one but how quick was Alabama a power again and how fast? I think it is more of the same with CPB and CNS in them awaking a sleeping giant. The only real argument is Byrant was fully committed to Alabama in many people's eyes due to longevity and him playing at Bama.Some people are pointing out that when the Bear was coaching he had no recruiting limits whereas Saban has to go against a more level playing field. However I'd like to point out that everyone the Bear went against had the same no recruiting limits he had so the field was just as level then as it is now.