If only 10% of what I've been hearing about xCHF for years are true, I hope they burn everything down. Some of it is shocking, even in today's world.I've got a feeling this Briarcrest stuff could end up being reminiscent of Bill Cosby's current civil and criminal legal troubles.
Don't forget; he was the coach of the girls basketball team for years; things that make you HmmmIf only 10% of what I've been hearing about xCHF for years are true, I hope they burn everything down. Some of it is shocking, even in today's world.
Don't lie to the media...they will burn you.Dan continues to spit fire when talking Freeze and Ole Miss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that Chizik stills has Cam's recruitment hanging over his head. Plus without Cam he would have been IMO a colossal failure.I think it all depends on how hard the NCAA hammer hits. Of course, my question is....how is it possible that Derek Dooley is on this list but Gene Chizik is NOT? Chizik did win a national title, Dooley never even won his division.
Maybe they should just go get Mack Brown.....
I think we're going to find out. Investigative reporters are smelling blood.If only 10% of what I've been hearing about xCHF for years are true, I hope they burn everything down. Some of it is shocking, even in today's world.
True, and I agree - but that doesn't explain how Derek Dooley IS on the list......he was a blundering fool, too. Besides, at least with Chizik the Rebels can look and say, "There's a guy who knows how to cheat and get away with it!"I think that Chizik stills has Cam's recruitment hanging over his head. Plus without Cam he would have been IMO a colossal failure.
Shula would be a better pick than DooleyTrue, and I agree - but that doesn't explain how Derek Dooley IS on the list......he was a blundering fool, too. Besides, at least with Chizik the Rebels can look and say, "There's a guy who knows how to cheat and get away with it!"
True, and I agree - but that doesn't explain how Derek Dooley IS on the list......he was a blundering fool, too. Besides, at least with Chizik the Rebels can look and say, "There's a guy who knows how to cheat and get away with it!"
Agreed, and he could even sell himself with, "I have experience rebuilding from a crippling probation" along with "I was single-handedly responsible for most of Alabama's pre-Saban losses," ha ha.....Shula would be a better pick than Dooley
One could plausibly argue the ones left over by Lane Kiffin hurt his recruiting. I'll accept that.As far as I know Dooley never had any NCAA issues.
I think you're giving Pat Dye WAY too much credit here; this was a guy who single-handedly blew his own career up while dealing with the NCAA. The thing with Chizik is that he was in essence hired as Mr Smith innocently going to Washington and finding sin.Chizik almost got busted even with Dye to help cover it up.
All that may be true, but again - HOW does this make DOOLEY a candidate? I can get the part about Chizik may carry too much baggage just from innuendo, but how in the world is a colossal failure at Tennessee suddenly one of the leading names to coach at Ole Miss?Without Dye to advise I don't think Chizek could get by. I wonder if Chizek ever got another gig if he would bring back the Trooper/Looper side show.
I think the only reason he is a candidate is because I think it will be extremely hard to find anyone to come into that mess. If the sanctions are as bad as I hope they will be Ole Miss will be in a world of hope trying to find anyone to take it. If I was an up and coming coach that was looking for my first job I wouldn't touch it. It will be interesting who they will end up with. I agree that Shula would be a LOT better choice than Dooley.All that may be true, but again - HOW does this make DOOLEY a candidate? I can get the part about Chizik may carry too much baggage just from innuendo, but how in the world is a colossal failure at Tennessee suddenly one of the leading names to coach at Ole Miss?
.
Maybe he has learned from his mistakes?Mike Shula - you guys are hilarious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that is why he is so high on that list. Ole Miss needs someone to play captain of a heavily damaged ship that is being towed to port. His job will be to keep it from taking on any more water until they can get it to dry dock.I think the only reason he is a candidate is because I think it will be extremely hard to find anyone to come into that mess. If the sanctions are as bad as I hope they will be Ole Miss will be in a world of hope trying to find anyone to take it. If I was an up and coming coach that was looking for my first job I wouldn't touch it. It will be interesting who they will end up with. I agree that Shula would be a LOT better choice than Dooley.
I think the only reason he is a candidate is because I think it will be extremely hard to find anyone to come into that mess. If the sanctions are as bad as I hope they will be Ole Miss will be in a world of hope trying to find anyone to take it. If I was an up and coming coach that was looking for my first job I wouldn't touch it. It will be interesting who they will end up with. I agree that Shula would be a LOT better choice than Dooley.
Yeah, I did. Can't remember why, though. I was working in Louisiana at the time (prior to moving here) and thought "Uh-oh. LSU's got a winner here."Go back and look at Nick Saban pre-LSU and BE HONEST - do any of you look at his record at Michigan St and say, "There's a guy who can turn it all around?"
Hasn't Dooley's Tennessee separation money run out by now? This one may be a good fit. He wasn't a great coach but I think he is probably an honorable man, and he may be ready to suck it up for a couple of years and pop 10 or 20 mill into the old retirement fund.I think Dooley is only a candidate because his father was an SEC legend. I think if his last name was Smith that it would not be on this list at all. Plus, Ole Miss has this obsession with former SEC personnel (Sloan/Brewer/Cutcliffe/Nutt/Freeze - only Tubs and Orgeron were different, and nobody thought Orgeron was on the radar nationally anyway).
Because he took over an MSU team riddled with NCAA sanctions and still fielded a respectable team.Go back and look at Nick Saban pre-LSU and BE HONEST - do any of you look at his record at Michigan St and say, "There's a guy who can turn it all around?"
No, you don't. Saban was a middling .500 football coach entering 1999, a guy with an 0-3 bowl record and an overall record of 25-23-1, who had never finished better than 5th in an 11-team league and was assumed to be a .500 coach since they play Ohio State either of his first two seasons.
He had ONE good year at Michigan State, and even that year had not only had a bunch of narrow wins but two blowout losses. Three plays the other way and Michigan State is 6-5 again.
But Saban has the name of a former head coach and LSU rolled the dice.