Did I read the article wrong? Isn't the subject of the article a girl who identifies as a boy? Not sure of the reason for the eye roll. But my wife rolls her eyes at me all the time and I rarely know why. I'm good at that.
Did I read the article wrong? Isn't the subject of the article a girl who identifies as a boy? Not sure of the reason for the eye roll. But my wife rolls her eyes at me all the time and I rarely know why. I'm good at that.
"He" or "it?"In fairness, he wanted to compete in the boys division, but the rules said he had to be in the one that matched his birth certificate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You may not be aware, and some folks here may not care, but intentionally misgendering someone is considered quite disrespectful.Did I read the article wrong? Isn't the subject of the article a girl who identifies as a boy? Not sure of the reason for the eye roll. But my wife rolls her eyes at me all the time and I rarely know why. I'm good at that.
The person in the article was biologically born a girl. That is a scientific fact. So I don't think I'm the one "misgendering". Regarding being disrespectful. Considering some of your responses to others on this board over the years. I would reconsider preaching to someone about being disrespectful to others.You may not be aware, and some folks here may not care, but intentionally misgendering someone is considered quite disrespectful.
With all the cross dressing going on these days who can tell? Or do clothes make the man/woman?You may not be aware, and some folks here may not care, but intentionally misgendering someone is considered quite disrespectful.
I'm pretty sure there are boys who are the same size she is when she's not artificially enhancing herself. Most of them choose their sports or other hobbies accordingly at some point.Agreed. Also, if it took drugs for this girl to be able to be competitive in the boys division then she didn't belong in the boys division. Now, I know the knee jerk answer from some will be "She wasn't taking them to be able to compete but to further the transition to being a boy." But that is somewhat irrelevant as it pertains to competing in a sport. The end result is she is taking a PED to put testosterone that isn't naturally in her body. So my guess is, if she would have simply competed in the boys division minus the testosterone. She would have gotten thrown all over the place and it would have looked like the Notre Dame/Alabama championship game in 2013. A massacre.
Pardon me. Maybe "it" would have been more appropriate.
Sex and gender are different. Assuming you're not validating the genitals or birth certificate of everyone you encounter in life before assigning them a pronoun, you probably decide their gender by how they outwardly present themselves. Treating this group any differently is simply disrespectful.The person in the article was biologically born a girl. That is a scientific fact. So I don't think I'm the one "misgendering". Regarding being disrespectful. Considering some of your responses to others on this board over the years. I would reconsider preaching to someone about being disrespectful to others.
See, this is the fundamental issue - you believe that with all your heart, but until it's proved scientifically, a vast majority of people aren't going to buy it. Most people will continue to believe it's a mental issue.Sex and gender are different.
If you start calling people out for being disrespectful (which I take personally). Then expect the same measuring stick to be applied to you. To suggest you haven't been disrespectful in some of your responses over the years on this board is laughable. The majority of us have. I wasn't being disrespectful to this girl as you claim. My position on the subject dictates my response. She was born a girl so I refer to her as "She". I had no malicious or disrespectful intent behind it. I don't buy into biologically a female but since they identify as a male then they are a male and I should treat them as so. I don't play along with that game.Sex and gender are different. Assuming you're not validating the genitals or birth certificate of everyone you encounter in life before assigning them a pronoun, you probably decide their gender by how they outwardly present themselves. Treating this group any differently is simply disrespectful.
I have no idea what your ad hominem is meant to reference. But if that's your opinion of me, I won't waste my time trying to convince you otherwise.
I appreciate your response. To be clear, though, the APA defines chromosomal sex and gender identity separately rather than as interchangeable terms per common usage -- so that is not my construct, rather the determination of the scientific community. Of course, as you say, that doesn't mean everyone will accept it.See, this is the fundamental issue - you believe that with all your heart, but until it's proved scientifically, a vast majority of people aren't going to buy it. Most people will continue to believe it's a mental issue.
IOW, you're fighting a unwinnable battle right now. Maybe where you live this is how people act, but in the rest of the world, there are two sexes, and sex and gender are the same thing.
sex
seks/Submit
noun
either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and many other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.
"adults of both sexes"
synonyms: gender
"adults of both sexes"
So you can preach about how disrespectful it is for most people to call a girl 'she' even if she 'identifies' as a boy, but it just makes you look odd (not to everyone, but to most people).
Fair enough. That's some very broad criteria.If you start calling people out for being disrespectful (which I take personally). Then expect the same measuring stick to be applied to you. To suggest you haven't been disrespectful in some of your responses over the years on this board is laughable. The majority of us have.
I'm glad you didn't intend the comment to be malicious. But to be clear, if you called this guy a "she" to his face, that would be an insult.I wasn't being disrespectful to this girl as you claim. My position on the subject dictates my response. She was born a girl so I refer to her as "She". I had no malicious or disrespectful intent behind it. I don't buy into biologically a female but since they identify as a male then they are a male and I should treat them as so. I don't play along with that game.
I certainly hope you can see the difference in these situations.My nephew for years "identified" as a dolphin (I'm being serious).
The APA and every majority psychiatric association has conclusively stated that this situation is not indicative of mental illness. Gender dysphoria is considered a stress-inducing mental condition that is caused by a transgender person being unable to correct their gender identity. The treatment is allowing them to proceed with gender identity conversion.Until proven otherwise, this gender identity issue is considered a mental illness and I will treat it as such.
Yeah, there are no rules for that. I'm not sure what his test levels would measure. I would speculate that they'd be somewhere in the range of normal rather than, say, akin to an athlete on anabolic steroids. But the range of normal is quite wide, so I'm not sure how good of a cutoff that is.My issue is the fact he was taking hormones (or whatever the scientific term is), which gave him an advantage. Even if he had been allowed to wrestle in the boys division, I think the hormone boosts would have given him an unfair advantage, although I don't know all the rules about that or how these drugs work.
What are you thoughts on this? The ex-former naacp leader who is actually white yet identifies as black. In the article (and I've read other places where she continues to hold to her belief) she expresses that though her skin is white there is nothing about her that identifies with the white race. I'll let you read the rest of it to get her full story. But my question is, where is the line on this "born one way but identify another way" drawn and who draws it?The APA and every majority psychiatric association has conclusively stated that this situation is not indicative of mental illness. Gender dysphoria is considered a stress-inducing mental condition that is caused by a transgender person being unable to correct their gender identity. The treatment is allowing them to proceed with gender identity conversion.