"Do you have any idea what you have to do to earn the nickname 'Mad Dog' in the Marine Corps?" - Marcus Luttrell
:biggrin2:
The government's primary media regulator has a new leader—and he's among the most outspoken critics of the net neutrality regulations put in place during the Barack Obama administration.
Aji Pai, who's served as an FCC commissioner since 2012, has been selected by President Donald Trump as the next chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, a role that will give him serious power to reshape how the government regulates the media and the internet.
Pai's appointment is a death knell for the major changes put in place under outgoing chairman Tom Wheeler, which gave the FCC greater power to prevent internet providers from blocking websites, throttling traffic, striking deals to create fast lanes, or really, anything else that would violate the principles of net neutrality.
regulations are bad m'kayI don't think most people understand the implications of this.
Donald Trump's new FCC pick is essentially a death sentence for net neutrality
You do realize it only sets us back less than a year prior to which it didn't exist. Were we measurably worse off then?I don't think most people understand the implications of this.
Donald Trump's new FCC pick is essentially a death sentence for net neutrality
You do realize it only sets us back less than a year prior to which it didn't exist. Were we measurably worse off then?
Yup.I don't think most people understand the implications of this.
that's not really true, or if true only on a technicality that doesn't even reach the "alternate fact" categoryYou do realize it only sets us back less than a year prior to which it didn't exist. Were we measurably worse off then?
at least he will fit in with that crewYeah Ajit Pai came up in our last discussion on net neutrality. I concluded he's a lying sack of crap.
Not good news.
So if that's not true tell me when it was enacted. I could have sworn it was February 15, 2015.that's not really true, or if true only on a technicality that doesn't even reach the "alternate fact" category
https://www.cnet.com/news/net-neutrality-from-there-to-here/
it was officially enacted then under the current regulation but there were earlier regulations, that had the same effect which also precluded the same behaviors we are concerned about for the years prior. Then prior to that the technology didn't really exist for these companies to behave badly. So yeah, you were technically correct that this rule has only existed since 2015 but that doesn't mean what you want it too. It doesn't mean that ending this rule today makes it just like 2014 and nothing will change, far from it actuallySo if that's not true tell me when it was enacted. I could have sworn it was February 15, 2015.
Thanks, I wasn't trying to be snarky, I just really don't know that much about it. Just what I've seen in headlines.it was officially enacted then under the current regulation but there were earlier regulations, that had the same effect which also precluded the same behaviors we are concerned about for the years prior. Then prior to that the technology didn't really exist for these companies to behave badly. So yeah, you were technically correct that this rule has only existed since 2015 but that doesn't mean what you want it too. It doesn't mean that ending this rule today makes it just like 2014 and nothing will change, far from it actually
no, it's notYeah Ajit Pai came up in our last discussion on net neutrality. I concluded he's a lying sack of crap.
Not good news.