Dude....it's rebalanced after every single census, so every 10 years. You'll get your wish in 4 years.I have two issues with the EC. (1) It disenfranchises red voters and blue states and blue voters in red states. (2) It gives far more representation to rural, predominantly white voters through the math of the EC system. Right now, one person's vote in Wyoming or the Dakotas is weighted ~4 times more than a vote from someone in a more heavily populated state. I would support a compromise whereby the number of EC votes per state is rebalanced to reflect the current population distribution. It wouldn't help with my first issue. But since I don't seriously believe the EC will be abolished in my lifetime until it disadvantages the GOP (which is unlikely due to issue #2), I would accept a reform that better balances state representation while keeping the system intact and not forcing nationwide recounts in years where there is no clear victor by popular vote to the tune of 1.5+ million.
But again, since the EC grants Republicans an institutional advantage, realistically nothing will be done.
Red/blue, blue/red....who gives a crap? Because you don't get your way doesn't mean you are disinfranchised or else 3rd partiers are disinfranchised everywhere and every presidential election. The EC is not about people's votes. Never was. It is about the vote of the states, which now all let people vote on the matter to make it more democratic but didn't always do so.