Agree. Snowball's chance in the Infernal Regions.
It escapes me how judges can subscribe to the "living constitution" school of thought given that there is an amendment process included therein. What's the point of the amendment process if you can simply interpret the words as you wish?
I must have missed the bit where Trump banned muslims.
Not simply because they are civilians. Now, if they don't know the difference between a weapon and a gun...
I can't help but notice that you are not even attempting to argue that DeVos is qualified for the position.
She's as qualified as a civilian (never-been-in-the-military) secretary of defense. Sometimes changes for the good are best effected by someone outside the fraternity. Nevertheless, the Department of Education isn't rocket science.
And the Department of Education has had higher standards over the years? Methinks not.
Well, you've already established that you have a skewed notion of what constitutes standards, so that's not much of an indictment.
i'm sure at least one or two on the n/s board would be on here defending the pick
What she did was probably not a violation of the cited Senate rule. On the other hand, if the words of another are not true, then the Senator reading the words on the Senate floor has probably violated the rule. Anyway, it's all amusing. The Dems act outraged over the matter, but Warren was playing a political trick just like Mitch did in silencing her on the Senate floor.
President Trump said:
President Trump said:
