This is the secret. You have to qualify through testing. Here, you sort of do, and, if you score highly enough, a lot of the financial burden is lifted off your family. In most first world countries, it's lifted entirely. However, in most other first world countries a huge portion of educational funds go into vocational training, which has been sorely neglected here...
Yes, but you're not a Fox commentator and thus don't have the president's ear daily. Think about it as an expansion of the Great Reality Show. The motto of the White House should be "Fake it."
Since Trump is replacing all his real lawyers with TV lawyers, it seems to me that he doesn't plan to fight Mueller in the courtroom. He will fire the Special Counsel, and the job of his TV lawyers will be to go on Fox News and defend it.
Very reasonable comments I agree that billions would need to be spent to even begin to manufacture consumer electronics. After all we gave up that entire industry to Asia in the 1980's. At another level I believe attacking China with such a blunt instrument doesn't consider all of the issues we have on the table with them such a North Korea. It definitely doesn't consider the fact that they are probably the largest holder of our incredible debt.
and yet we will be inundated with trump minions and i'm totes against trump, but hillary folks saying that there is no proof of collusion with russia and that this is just libtards being sore losers and not focusing on the real problems with america which are political correctness run amok and trump supporters not getting pats on the head for being so brave in standing up for their values.
No, I was assuming that you were on drugs.
I can absolutely see Trump spitballing the idea that "war is good for approval ratings, so let's just start one."
what i find most scary is the 80+% approval rating among the gop. and to add to that, the fact that i would find it scary, would make almost the entire 80% think that's a good thing.No, I was assuming that you were on drugs.
Between Trump's tariffs and the ascendancy of John Bolton, I'm growing truly scared about our future.
It is a new form of classical liberalism that informs the policy of global free trade, strong corporations, and weak states. Classical liberalism only sought to level the relationship between citizens and their state. This is very likely why the rise of nationalism in Europe occurred after the liberal revolution disruption. Peoples wanted to order themselves among their kind within a single state. I think neoliberalism is partly what people ascribe to libertarianism (a concept/politic alignment that really didn't exist until mid-century at the earliest): The best way to assure personal and economic freedom is with a nation-state that is weak. Conservatism has an odd relationship to capital because conservatism itself was a response to the liberal revolutions of the late 18th to mid 19th century which brought the economic freedom of capital markets to the masses in the West. What people thought was immutable such as social order and class stratification was proven to not be material and easily destroyed. Conservatism had a stand-offish relationship to capital because they deplored the up-jump nature and lacking aristocratic grace of the new wealth. Conservative theory came to realize that there was no going back to the old order of things but they could recreate something new but familiar within the modern constraints. This is how conservatism chummed up to the captains of industry in the back half of the 19th century. They could be the new aristocracy using money as a way to impart morality upon the masses. This is the crux of the paleo-con v. neo-con continuum. It is interesting that Marx saw the same problems with the liberal revolutions that furiously burned across Europe in the 19th century. His parent's generation was sold on the liberty and prosperity that would come with capital and democracy/republicanism but the practicality of it was that the old lords were replaced with bosses which only differed in that they had no divine rights (the death of the social gospel in favor of the prosperity gospel helped to fix that issue though!). What Marx had identified early on was how quickly the liberal revolution momentum was lost and what had developed was a new order same as the old order.No, I was assuming that you were on drugs.
Between Trump's tariffs and the ascendancy of John Bolton, I'm growing truly scared about our future.
Even a casual viewer must believe that we are heading into Iran, without I believe the Brits and Europeans this time around. Surely they would not get distracted from the Russia threat on their doorsteps.
that should be awesome. he seems to think the troubles he is having is because of the folks surrounding him are giving him bad advice.
Reminds me of this Iran invasion war game our armed forces do every year (or few years) where in 2013 or 2014 the flag officer decided to fight the Iranian notional forces in an asymmetric manner. Iran actually has a competent military compared to Iraq but they would still have to use inventive strategies. Anyway, he basically did the fictional Battle of Blackwater Bay with their limited naval forces from what I've gathered...he also tried to avoid direct confrontation with the strength of the invading force as much as possible. He was owning our military, turning this invasion into an ugly, bloody affair and we're not even to the occupation. I have my doubts about getting into a fight with Iran because they paused the war game and changed the rules so the notional Iranian forces would have "to fight good" so our military industrial complex could come out on top and get warm fuzzies.
he is trying to distract from the upcoming 60 minutes interview with the porn star he had sex with multiple times while and soon after his third wife was pregnant
