When we rise up, I'm taking all of yours.You're free to do with your money however you wish. Do me the courtesy of giving me the same freedom.
When we rise up, I'm taking all of yours.You're free to do with your money however you wish. Do me the courtesy of giving me the same freedom.
Liberals love other people's money, especially when they can avoid spending their own.You're free to do with your money however you wish. Do me the courtesy of giving me the same freedom.
FIFY.Politicians love other people's money, especially when they can avoid spending their own.
Is someone preventing you from retreating to the island nation of Freedonia, where the invisible hand fulfills all needs in accordance with your ability to pay?You're free to do with your money however you wish. Do me the courtesy of giving me the same freedom.
It won't, if it could then we would've had it under Carter. Unless there is a massive liberal spring in Congress then I give it no chance of happening. We are a right centered political country that moves very slow on policy. If we were a Parliamentary democracy then I say we would have it once the liberals take power.Our healthcare costs are the highest in the world. Take a look at this chart of longevity from The Economist. Something has to give...
LINK
Should this not strengthen the Democratic Progressives over time, as most of the Tea Party are Baby Boomers?Dang, people were talking up FEMA Death Camps or whatever over Obamacare but the GOP plan plainly will attempt to kill off the boomer generation.
It's been headed that way for a long time. We may also be the most obese, unhealthy nation in the word.Our healthcare costs are the highest in the world.
While taxation is not theft, it requires a majority representation. Currently the liberals who support that view don't have that today.You're right taxation is theft. I'm a pawn for corporate power!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/05/28/are-u-s-doctors-paid-too-much/#1313909d5252You sure about that because the federalized basic healthcare nations are paying a lower percentage of their GDP than we are on healthcare?
At what age? And the chart in that article would benefit by including the average debt doctors carry when starting their careers.https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/05/28/are-u-s-doctors-paid-too-much/#1313909d5252
Have you also noticed that doctors in the US earn on average 78% more than the doctors in those countries? Doctors in this country are typically in the top 1% of earners.
I was just trying to point out that if you start comparing costs of care from country to country every way you try to address will negatively impact someone. In my opinion the consumers of health care are a large part of the problem. I am old enough to remember when insurance never paid for doctor visits at least the way they do now. In the 80s when BCBS Alabama began PMD insurance coverage I was paying $18 for an office visit. That was immediately lowered to a $15 copay accompanied by BCBS paying the balance of $41 that was the "agreed" charge. Nothing else changed. My healthcare was not any better and my doctor didn't change. At that time I was an Executive in a manufacturing concern that provided my insurance. In that role I was learning that people that hadn't gone to the doctor on a regular basis were now going to get their toenail trimmed at the doctor's office(that is not an exaggeration it is a fact). We as a country over several decades have reimagined the definition of need / necessity. That all comes at a price. The real question is who will pay for my wants that I now define as needs, you or me? I think it should be me.At what age? And the chart in that article would benefit by including the average debt doctors carry when starting their careers.
Schooling and earning potential is an interesting balance. If someone gets a job out of high school, they immediately start earning money (and potentially saving for retirement, saving for investment in a home, etc.). If you push that further down the road in pursuit of a bachelor degree, you're behind four years in earning potential. More than the delay in earnings, it can be a net negative proposition if loans are required to fund schooling. To offset that loss, jobs that require a bachelor's degree typically pay higher than those requiring only a high school diploma.
In the case of professional degrees, your salary start date is pushed even farther down the road. Factor in 4 years for a bachelors that may involve loans, 4-5 years for an MD that itself will almost certainly accrue at least $150,000 of debt, and 4-10 years of residency and fellowship training where you're paid less than minimum wage. Only after that, typically in your mid 30s to early 40s, does a doctor start making the kind of salary that table describes. And in nearly every case, their starting point is not $0, but a negative $100k-200k. This is why doctors eventually get paid a lot. Deal with the high cost of education and terrible handling of student loans, and doctors' pay will likely decrease. But in terms of our overall expenditure on healthcare as a nation, physician compensation is equivalent to a rounding error.
Corporate profit is just extracted labor value. All corporate profit is theft.While taxation is not theft, it requires a majority representation. Currently the liberals who support that view don't have that today.
It's quite likely they will get rid of the voting rights act by then and be able to restrict the Democrat constituency .Should this not strengthen the Democratic Progressives over time, as most of the Tea Party are Baby Boomers?
Oh now you've done it.Corporate profit is just extracted labor value. All corporate profit is theft.
Corporate profit is just extracted labor value. All corporate profit is theft.
he still never let himself be waterboarded like he promisedare Fox News Vacations the equivalent of sending a pet to live on a farm upstate?
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/p...ws-Seth-Rich-advertiser-boycott-vacation.html
do they ever actually come back?
Let's hope not