The policy and politics of Trumpism
Page 1 of 455 123456781151101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 5914
  1. #1

    The policy and politics of Trumpism

    We have one grand thread on the campaign and another on Trump's personnel. I feel like we need a separate space devoted to his policy decisions, since he's already making some.

    WSJ slams Trump's Carrier negotiation

    Everyoneóeven the Obama White Houseóis hailing the move as a great political victory, and in the short term it is for those Indianapolis workers, who make more than $20 an hour on average. But as U.S. auto workers have learned the hard way, real job security depends on the profitability of the business. Carrier wanted to move the production line to Mexico to stay competitive in the market for gas furnaces. If the extra costs of staying in Indianapolis erode that business, those workers will lose their jobs eventually in any case.

    This isnít to fault Mr. Hayesís decision, since Mr. Trump made him an offer he couldnít refuse. The state of Indiana threw in $7 million in tax incentives, but those werenít decisive. Mr. Trumpís real hammer is his threat to impose a tariff on Carrier imports to the U.S. Carrier has a 30% share of the U.S. gas-furnace market, and a 35% tariff could kill the business. Thatís the same sword Mr. Trump previously held over Ford Motor Co.

    [UTC, which owns Carrier] is no corporate scofflaw. It pays $2 billion a year in taxes and offers to finance four years of college for every employee. Its exports are worth $10 billion a year, mostly in aerospace products, which support some 40,000 American jobs.

    A mercantilist Trump trade policy that jeopardized those exports would throw far more Americans out of work than the relatively low-paying jobs heís preserved for now in Indianapolis. Mr. Trumpís Carrier squeeze might even cost more U.S. jobs if it makes CEOs more reluctant to build plants in the U.S. because it would be politically difficult to close them.

    Mr. Trump has now muscled his way into at least two corporate decisions about where and how to do business. But who would you rather have making a decision about where to make furnaces or cars? A company whose profitability depends on making good decisions, or a branding executive turned politician who wants to claim political credit?

    The larger point is that America wonít become more prosperous by forcing companies to make noneconomic investments. A nation gets rich when individuals and business are allowed to take risks as they see fit in a competitive economy. Politicians are rotten investors. Mr. Trump would help the economy, and his Presidency, far more if he focuses on getting the pro-growth parts of his agenda through Congress.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    FB Moderator Bamabuzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Where ever there's BBQ, Crawfish & Football
    Posts
    21,515

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    I only read the part you quoted. I'm not creating an account to read the article. But I saw one of my democrat voting friends post something similar on FB last night about this topic. So basically the article says the government (which is about to be Mr. Trump and his cabinet) needs to stay out of private business because they know nothing about how to run a business? That's the fundamentals of what I'm reading. I completely agree. As I asked my democrat voting friend who posted about this same topic. "What made you start thinking this way? Because any other time you want government asserting regulations and policies that basically force private companies to do what you think they ought to. Now you want less governmental involvement? The smell of irony or should I say hypocrisy?"


    The larger point is that America won’t become more prosperous by forcing companies to make noneconomic investments. A nation gets rich when individuals and business are allowed to take risks as they see fit in a competitive economy. Politicians are rotten investors.
    LOL! I can't stop laughing. LOL!
    The existence of God isn't determined in the thoughts of man. God exists, no matter what man thinks.

    "It cost a lot of money to look this cheap."-Dolly Parton.

    "If you ever want to know how good your barbecue is start charging for it"-Myron Mixon

  4. #3
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Tide1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    15,034

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Trump is promising to make it cheaper for companies to operate in the United States. He may not keep that promise and/or the promise may not even be achievable, but he is promising reduced costs to companies like Carrier.
    The Concord Blue Devils, 18-Time World Champions: 2017, 2015, 2014 (99.65), 2012, 2010, 2009, 2007, 2003, 1999, 1997, 1996, 1994, 1986, 1982, 1980, 1979, 1977, & 1976. Enriching the lives of young people through a commitment to youth development and performance excellence.

    ďThe discovery of a wine is of greater moment than the discovery of a constellation. The universe is too full of stars.Ē ― Benjamin Franklin

  5. #4
    BamaNation Hall of Fame Tide1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    15,034

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by Bamabuzzard View Post
    I only read the part you quoted. I'm not creating an account to read the article. But I saw one of my democrat voting friends post something similar on FB last night about this topic. So basically the article says the government (which is about to be Mr. Trump and his cabinet) needs to stay out of private business because they know nothing about how to run a business? That's the fundamentals of what I'm reading. I completely agree. As I asked my democrat voting friend who posted about this same topic. "What made you start thinking this way? Because any other time you want government asserting regulations and policies that basically force private companies to do what you think they ought to. Now you want less governmental involvement? The smell of irony or should I say hypocrisy?"




    LOL! I can't stop laughing. LOL!
    Obama...cough, cough...care. Minimum...cough, cough...wage hikes. New...cough, cough...overtime rules. Dodd...cough, cough...Frank. If I keep going I may just choke to death.
    The Concord Blue Devils, 18-Time World Champions: 2017, 2015, 2014 (99.65), 2012, 2010, 2009, 2007, 2003, 1999, 1997, 1996, 1994, 1986, 1982, 1980, 1979, 1977, & 1976. Enriching the lives of young people through a commitment to youth development and performance excellence.

    ďThe discovery of a wine is of greater moment than the discovery of a constellation. The universe is too full of stars.Ē ― Benjamin Franklin

  6. #5
    BamaNation All-SEC tidegrandpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Corpus Christi,Tx via Mobile, Tuscaloosa
    Posts
    1,813

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by Tide1986 View Post
    Obama...cough, cough...care. Minimum...cough, cough...wage hikes. New...cough, cough...overtime rules. Dodd...cough, cough...Frank. If I keep going I may just choke to death.
    cough,Sarbanes...cough,Oxley,cough...Fannie Mae,GM,cough....Dodge,Fiat,,cough..E........ cough,......P.......cough....A

  7. #6
    Thread Starter

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by Bamabuzzard View Post
    I only read the part you quoted. I'm not creating an account to read the article.
    Odd. It wasn't blocked when I posted it, but now my link throws the article behind a paywall. Yet if you google the title "Trumpís Carrier Shakedown" and click the WSJ link, you can read the entire op-ed for free. Just FYI.

    But I saw one of my democrat voting friends post something similar on FB last night about this topic. So basically the article says the government (which is about to be Mr. Trump and his cabinet) needs to stay out of private business because they know nothing about how to run a business? That's the fundamentals of what I'm reading. I completely agree. As I asked my democrat voting friend who posted about this same topic. "What made you start thinking this way? Because any other time you want government asserting regulations and policies that basically force private companies to do what you think they ought to. Now you want less governmental involvement? The smell of irony or should I say hypocrisy?"
    My view is that completely non-regulated capitalism is better for business, while modest regulation is better for the consumer. I linked the WSJ since I figured it would resonate with more of the board and start a discussion, but that doesn't mean I agree with every point it raises. For those who oppose business regulation, do you support Trump's threat of imposing import tariffs on American goods manufactured outside the country? Or using the power of the presidency to threaten companies that are considering moves overseas?

    That said, I think this Carrier deal is very shortsighted with little gain. They're still sending jobs to Mexico, and Indiana taxpayers now get to subsidize the company for $7 million in what amounts to a political stunt. If I'm a big American company, I'm probably now more likely to threaten moving jobs overseas so that Trump swoops in and throws me some sweet, sweet tax breaks. If this is an example of his negotiating prowess, I'm not impressed.

  8. #7
    Thread Starter

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by Tide1986 View Post
    Trump is promising to make it cheaper for companies to operate in the United States. He may not keep that promise and/or the promise may not even be achievable, but he is promising reduced costs to companies like Carrier.
    True, and I'm sure they're banking on that actually happening. We'll see.

  9. #8
    BamaNation Hall of Fame 92tide's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga, USA
    Posts
    26,280

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by CharminTide View Post
    Odd. It wasn't blocked when I posted it, but now my link throws the article behind a paywall. Yet if you google the title "Trump’s Carrier Shakedown" and click the WSJ link, you can read the entire op-ed for free. Just FYI.


    My view is that completely non-regulated capitalism is better for business, while modest regulation is better for the consumer. I linked the WSJ since I figured it would resonate with more of the board and start a discussion, but that doesn't mean I agree with every point it raises. For those who oppose business regulation, do you support Trump's threat of imposing import tariffs on American goods manufactured outside the country? Or using the power of the presidency to threaten companies that are considering moves overseas?

    That said, I think this Carrier deal is very shortsighted with little gain. They're still sending jobs to Mexico, and Indiana taxpayers now get to subsidize the company for $7 million in what amounts to a political stunt. If I'm a big American company, I'm probably now more likely to threaten moving jobs overseas so that Trump swoops in and throws me some sweet, sweet tax breaks. If this is an example of his negotiating prowess, I'm not impressed.
    i was going to suggest the google route on wsj (works for nyt too i have heard).

    on the trail, trump implied he would "make" companies keep jobs here by being a tough negotiator. sounds like his idea of "making" them is just giving them a sweetheart deal to keep a few of their jobs here. so like you say, now it's set up where there is an incentive companies threaten to move jobs overseas unless they get a sweetheart deal. sounds a lot like some of those pro sports stadium deals. i expect to see lots of shiny objects like this in the next few years. i also expect many of our fellow countryfolk, especially the ones that consistently rail against federal government overreach, especially in the executive branch, to extol the virtues of said shiny objects.
    The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

    - George Orwell

    If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they donít have to worry about the answers.

    ó Thomas Pynchon

  10. #9

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    While I agree with your statement about unrestricted capitalism I don't think we can agree on what unrestricted capitalism means. For that to be accomplished we would have to limit the power of regulations. For instance the EPA to prevent US companies from burning coal but are fine with selling it to China so they can use it the same way. Aren't we all under the same sky?

  11. #10
    BamaNation All-SEC tidegrandpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Corpus Christi,Tx via Mobile, Tuscaloosa
    Posts
    1,813

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by CharminTide View Post
    Odd. It wasn't blocked when I posted it, but now my link throws the article behind a paywall. Yet if you google the title "Trump’s Carrier Shakedown" and click the WSJ link, you can read the entire op-ed for free. Just FYI.


    My view is that completely non-regulated capitalism is better for business, while modest regulation is better for the consumer. I linked the WSJ since I figured it would resonate with more of the board and start a discussion, but that doesn't mean I agree with every point it raises. For those who oppose business regulation, do you support Trump's threat of imposing import tariffs on American goods manufactured outside the country? Or using the power of the presidency to threaten companies that are considering moves overseas?

    That said, I think this Carrier deal is very shortsighted with little gain. They're still sending jobs to Mexico, and Indiana taxpayers now get to subsidize the company for $7 million in what amounts to a political stunt. If I'm a big American company, I'm probably now more likely to threaten moving jobs overseas so that Trump swoops in and throws me some sweet, sweet tax breaks. If this is an example of his negotiating prowess, I'm not impressed.
    I know you surely have done the math on the measly $7 million(vs, the $500 million Solyndra guarantee) over 10 year subsidy. The average job that this keeps pays over $20.00 per hour or over $41,000 per year for 800-1000 jobs. The subsidy amounts to roughly $700.00 per job per year.

  12. #11
    BamaNation All-SEC BamaInMo1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cumming, GA
    Posts
    1,481

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    I really love how all of the liberals (not necessarily calling out anyone on this board but just speaking in general) now want the president elect to stay out of things. It's especially funny when trying keep jobs in America instead of letting them flitter away to other countries - mostly due to EPA over regulation and Union Strong arming (both of which seem to be tenets of he left). But now the gvt needs to butt out.............

  13. #12
    BamaNation All-American MattinBama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Titus, AL
    Posts
    4,878

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Paging Bazza.




  14. #13
    BamaNation Hall of Fame 92tide's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga, USA
    Posts
    26,280

    Re: The policy and politics of Trumpism

    Quote Originally Posted by BamaInMo1 View Post
    I really love how all of the liberals (not necessarily calling out anyone on this board but just speaking in general) now want the president elect to stay out of things. It's especially funny when trying keep jobs in America instead of letting them flitter away to other countries - mostly due to EPA over regulation and Union Strong arming (both of which seem to be tenets of he left). But now the gvt needs to butt out.............
    the op is about the wsj wanting the president-elect to stay out of things.
    The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

    - George Orwell

    If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they donít have to worry about the answers.

    ó Thomas Pynchon

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

TideFansStore.com: Get YOUR gear!