I completely get what you are saying. That said, this has been completely of Paladino's own making. He wasn't baited. No one stretched the meaning of his words. The media are not making a mountain out of the proverbial molehill this time.
Also, when prosecuting crimes we don't look for someone from each side to take down. We take it as it comes. That's how it should be anyway. That's "equality under the law". It doesn't always lead to equal numbers. Equality in opportunity. Equality in application of the law. Not equality in outcomes.
It's sad that we are talking about adults here. It is not lost on me that this is an older gentleman from another time. My dad is in his 80's and, God love him, he grew up in a different time and on the occasional time when he makes an offensive remark he doesn't realize how offensive it is. Old age brings out some of those things adults try to hold back over the years. Dementia doesn't help either and can turn the sweetest person mean. So I can say that this guy may have some things working against him. Then again, he may have been like this more or less his entire life. Who knows except those who best know him? Either way, the comments should be easy to condemn for what they are even if some sympathy is retained for the man who said them.
But now let me be plain spoken and forward......the man is in a POLITICAL position. Politics is ALWAYS evolving (is not gay marriage a GREAT example of that one?). The man should NOT be in politics if he doesn't understand MODERN politics.
And while I hate the press, you're right - he was NOT baited. This was NOT Connie Chung interviewing Newt Gingrich's mother and then torpedoing her.
We are about to find out if Trump REALLY is any sort of a good politician. The good ones cut their losses immediately and throw whomever overboard. The GREAT ones pull it off by reassigning the same person to something that gives them a job but takes them out of the public eye. Reagan's advisers, in particular, were usually phenomenal on this front.
Most of our Presidents - to be blunt about it - are sissies who lack fortitude when it comes to actually firing somebody. Gerald Ford was an intelligent guy, but he bumbled repeatedly and lacked the hammer blow to finish off people who embarrassed him (Earl Butz was the most notable example - more on him in a moment). Carter had the same problem. And Reagan, for all of his posing as a big, tough leader, stood by people like James Watt, Al Haig, Ed Meese, and Don Regan far too long before their removals (Meese resigned, Regan resigned because he was going to be fired). Clinton, too, could hardly be roused to blow anyone up with one notable exception - if it was going to hurt his popularity to keep someone on, he fired them (Jocelyn Elders was every bit as extreme a nutbag prior to the comments that got her fired.....he fired her because he'd just gotten creamed in the mid-terms).
We just don't have many guys anymore who will be as ruthless as is sometimes necessary when it comes to sending embarrassments packing.
(And I'm sitting here thinking, "And Trump is going to channel his old TV persona and make the wrong kind of spectacle out of 'you're fired.'" Just watch).