For sure the Obama comparison has been helpful.Race relations are the worst they have been in 40 years. On the upside, he has convinced me George W. Bush wasn't a moron.
Honestly, that was my biggest fear with Hillary losing. I thought it might affect the run.We went 89-9 and won four national championships.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
fify.Race relations are the worst they have been in 40 years. On the upside, he has convinced me George W. Bush wasn't a complete moron.
Wow, Truman was worse than Carter. I wasn't alive then, but I had heard there were a lot of folks less than chuffed with Harry.Yet per Gallup, he ended up 1.4% lower (48%) than G.W. Bush (49.4%) in average approval rating.
Clinton was 55.1%
G.H.W. Bush was 60.9%
Reagan was 52.8%
Carter was 45.5%
Ford was 47.2%
Nixon was 49.1%
Johnson was 55.1%
Kennedy was 70.1%
Eisenhower was 65%
Truman was 45.4%
FDR was 63%
averages can be deceiving. w got approval ratings of 90+ % in the weeks following 9/11 and steadily went down afterwards. his second term average was in the mid-high 30s.Yet per Gallup, he ended up 1.4% lower (48%) than G.W. Bush (49.4%) in average approval rating.
Clinton was 55.1%
G.H.W. Bush was 60.9%
Reagan was 52.8%
Carter was 45.5%
Ford was 47.2%
Nixon was 49.1%
Johnson was 55.1%
Kennedy was 70.1%
Eisenhower was 65%
Truman was 45.4%
FDR was 63%
Thank you California.averages can be deceiving. w got approval ratings of 90+ % in the weeks following 9/11 and steadily went down afterwards. his second term average was in the mid-high 30s.
w left office with approval ratings in the 20's-30's depending on the poll you use for reference. obama will leave office with approval ratings over 50%.
"Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!"The Crimson Tide's record under his administration. Greatest.President.EVER!!!! If you think otherwise you're a bigot, racist or a Barner....or all three. ROLL TIDE!!!!
Yes. But likely influenced by higher population areas full of people who think Obama has done a good job.those are nationwide numbers.
It's like with any "polling" or "survey". They survey between 1,000-2,000 people then take the answers from those and project it across a much larger group of people. There's a lot of assumptions built in to the polls/surveys.I think the polling science needs another look. It seems that some polls show one thing when reality is another. Not so much about POTUS but the election polls were waaaay offff.