Yep, he's a total d-bag.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...-to-him/ar-AAm1TvX?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...-to-him/ar-AAm1TvX?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
300 people sharing partial ownership in like a quarter of an acre? And most don't even know they are part owners. Pretty intense.Their lands make up slightly more than eight acres.
The defendants may hold just a tiny fraction of ownership in the parcels because they are several generations removed from the original owners, according to the paper's story on the cases.
One suit, according to the Star-Advertiser, was filed against about 300 people who are descendants of an immigrant Portuguese sugar cane plantation worker who bought four parcels totaling two acres of land in 1894.
One of that worker's great-grandchildren, Carlos Andrade, 72, lived on the property until recently, the paper said. But the retired university professor told the Star-Advertiser that he is helping Zuckerberg's case as a co-plaintiff in an effort to make sure the land is not surrendered to the county if no one in his extended clan steps up to take responsibility for paying property taxes on the plots.
Andrade, in a letter to his known relatives, said he believed selling to Zuckerberg would ensure that the relatives get "their fair share" of their ancestor's investment in the property — while avoiding further dilution of the value of individual property shares due to the clan increasing in size, the paper reported.
In the same letter, Andrade estimated that a large majority of his relatives are unaware that they have an ownership stake in the land.
I do know that he was petitioning to be able to build a super tall fence. That may have gotten ruled out though because it was so tall that it blocked views of the ocean and the breeze for other neighbors.He wants to be more exclusive. I wonder if he wants to build a wall around it after he forces them to sell?