News Article: Trump Signs Order To Continue Keystone, Dakota Pipelines
- Thread starter Intl.Aperture
- Start date
I hope the thoughts came before the action.
Jokes aside, I am interested in the details. This could go either way with me. I know personally how that the previous administration played politics with the energy sector, but I'll have to see if this is well thought out or (more probably) just more of the same from a different angle.
1. Expected.
2. Like the requirement for using US steel.
3. Hope that "expedited environmental review" doesn't turn out to be a euphemism for "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead".
2. Like the requirement for using US steel.
3. Hope that "expedited environmental review" doesn't turn out to be a euphemism for "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead".
My default position is to support the continued development of domestic energy as long as there is justification in the market to do so. Regarding the steel, the customer should get the best deal possible, so I don't see the justification for the domestic requirement.
Doesn't a treaty give the Indians control of part of the land the pipeline goes through. Does PaleFace speak with forked tongue again?
I think the land is only close to the land covered by the treaty. I say drill baby drill and let's pipe our fill. Of course I am biased, I have an out of work oil field hand in my family. Yes I know that is a greedy position, but it's an honest one.
Refineries are approaching capacity. The largest US refinery is owned by Saudi Arabia.
Employing how many Americans? Roughly 1,200?
And hopefully we haven't forgotten how to build refineries (infrastructure).
Latest threads
-
-
Question: Chris Youngblood did he commit over the weekend?
- Started by mlingerfelt31
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-