Now before you start thinking that I'm jumping up and playing the race card, remember I posted here on this board a fairly large post about why Obama shouldn't accept a significant number of Syrian refugees when it was suggested. I believe, as you do that Islam is fundamentally broken, and is in no way the religion of peace. My reasons were primarily socioeconomic in nature, and due to the realistic assumption that bringing a bunch of people into the country without the economic support to ensure that they are not allowed to self radicalize due to not having enough opportunities.
So now it obviously seems as if I am trying to play both sides of the fence. I'll state my positions plainly. The presidents immigration/entry ban is not and never can do anything but alienate the Muslim world. We as Americans need more muslims to join in the fight or else we have already lost. I don't believe that you can win a war of ideology by playing into the fears and propaganda being perpetuated by the imams who are taking advantage of an uneducated, disadvantaged, and disillusioned segment of the Muslim population and using that to create an army of martyrs.
I guess my main thing is that standing up and claiming this immigration ban will make America safe when you (the royal you) feel as if America would be better off with all muslims gone is disingenuous. It seems as if you are unwilling to state your position plainly and would rather hide your xenophobia behind the immigration ban, when it is obviously an illogical solution to what you feel is one of the major issues in American society. The majority of people affected by this ban have showed more respect for the American system as it stands than the Cheeto in chief who it seems to me is trying to make these people welcome by acting like a despot who believes he gets to rule by fiat.