Re: Did Bama B-Ball Overor Under Achieve?
You can argue they overachieved because of the limited talent they have on the roster. And they definitely were limited at certain positions in talent. But one way you overcome that is by supreme effort. The kind of effort they gave during the SEC tournament. Especially against Kentucky, they just looked different. They played with more energy and more forcefulness. So everyone gets excited and says they're improving and they're going to make some noise in the NIT. But then they come out against Richmond standing around and lacking focus and energy. And that happened several times throughout the year. That's what makes you want to say they underachieved. And the fact that they just don't learn to do certain fundamental things. The color guy mentioned it during the Richmond game when he asked where are the closeouts on the three point shots. Bama would come out with their hands down shuffling their feet. You have to have hands up and run to the ball and get them off of the three point line. And so Bama was a very poor perimeter defensive team against teams that could shoot the 3 decently. And that has nothing really to do with talent. And players that shot free throws poorly most of the year shot them well in games like South Carolina in the SEC tournament. So it was possible for them to shoot them well. The lack of focus, energy, flow, and fundamentals in certain areas makes me say they slightly underachieved when you consider the talent on the SEC teams they played.
We're fortunate we played Missouri, MSU, and LSU twice in the SEC schedule. The other double opponent was Auburn. We played the four worst teams twice. Imagine if we would have played Kentucky, Florida, South Carolina, and Arkansas twice (we did play SC twice but one was in the SEC tournament). That helps explain the SEC record a little bit. We went 12-9 in SEC games and 7 of those wins were against the three worst teams in the league. We went 0-2 against the fourth worst team in the league. Two of the wins came against an upper echelon team that was a good matchup for us, anemic on offense and defensively tough. The other wins in conference were against Ole Miss at home on senior night, at home against Vandy before they got hot and while they were playing poorly, and a good road win by 20 points against Georgia. There was nothing impressive about the non-conference results. When you break it down, there's not a lot to say they overachieved.
Did anyone see the Inside Alabama Basketball feature they ran on the SEC Network? It showed a lot of the inner workings of the team around the Georgia game that was at home. I love Coach Johnson's personality and energy and I was expecting to see him really connecting with the players and see them really responding to him. But the part I saw it didn't really look that way. Maybe it's just the personality of this team but there almost seemed to be a disconnect between Coach Avery and the team. Maybe that's why some of these things did not seem to improve.