Oh, wow. I'm completely stunned in the world of championships one group is against a rule that might help an opponent but the opponent thinks the decision makes all the sense in the world because it helps them."The bottom line," one Big Ten coach said, "is that the SEC doesn't want change. If it's not good for their league, they will fight it."
Isn't this the point of a conference?"The bottom line," one Big Ten coach said, "is that the SEC doesn't want change. If it's not good for their league, they will fight it."
Maybe Enhanced Angry? Moderately Mad?Describing this as "howling mad" seems a bit much, particularly since Bielema of all people sounds reasonable for a change.
May I offer "overcome by the vapors"?Maybe Enhanced Angry? Moderately Mad?
so the northern schools want to trick the southern players into signing with them by convincing them the weather up north isn't cold?College football's ruling class longs to protect its turf. Those coaches don't want prospects from the South visiting Big Ten campuses when the weather is nice.
I wasn't offended because I thought the same thing. I thought howling was a reach also. I would have titled my article "B1G whiney faced over SEC actions."May I offer "overcome by the vapors"?
And Redwood, I wasn't impugning your word choice. "Howling mad" came straight from the article.
And I would have Titled it" SEC and B1G conferences each trying to do what is best for itself".I wasn't offended because I thought the same thing. I thought howling was a reach also. I would have titled my article "B1G whiney faced over SEC actions."
Yes, but you would have had lots fewer clicks than me and I would get the next raise. :smile:And I would have Titled it" SEC and B1G conferences each trying to do what is best for itself".